Obstacles Faced by Operational Managers in Coaching and Mentoring

Introduction 

Organizations rely on the best talents to achieve their objectives. Markedly, organizations manage to create the best talents through coaching and mentoring. Operational managers are supposed to provide the highest coaching and mentoring standards to achieve the best. Consequently, this ensures that the company gets the best employees to deliver business objectives. However, there is concern that operational managers face various challenges in coaching and mentoring. Therefore, the research explores some substantial obstacles faced by operational managers during coaching and mentoring. Additionally, the research will discuss the best strategies to prevent these obstacles and the operational areas that require support to achieve the best. Operational managers face many challenges in coaching and mentoring, and this includes a lack of enough resources and organizational politics, and proper planning and communication are the best solutions.  

Obstacles to Coaching and Mentoring from The Operational Managers’ Perspective 

First, lack of enough resources is one of the significant obstacles faced by operational managers during coaching and mentoring. It is essential to note that coaching and mentoring is a long-term process intended to create the best talents for the organization. Therefore, there are various materials needed for effective coaching and mentoring. For instance, a computer is one of the notable requirements for proper coaching and mentoring process. Computers are used for different mentoring and coaching activities, and research and communication are some examples (Algozzini & Gabay, 2017). For instance, those going through coaching and mentoring can learn through computers and gain important information. Moreover, there are instances where computers are used in communication through emails and other channels. However, the situation is different when there is a limited number of computers to complete this operation. The operational managers will struggle to achieve effective communication and ensure that all learners are gaining from coaching. Furthermore, operational managers will also find it complicated to help the students to complete research. Organizations must provide operational managers with enough resources to ensure they offer the best coaching process. Therefore, this proves that limited resources act as obstacles since they limit coaching and mentoring goals.  

Second, organizational politics also hinder operational managers during coaching and mentoring. Various organizational politics might limit operational managers from achieving the best from coaching and mentoring. For instance, there is the issue of opposing the selected operational team that should offer to coach and mentor. There are many instances in organizations where some people oppose the selected operation managers since they do not fit their interests (Benefits of Coaching for Individuals, 2019). Consequently, this results in coaching and mentoring obstacle since the operational team cannot concentrate on their duties. They might fail to deliver the best results if they are continuously opposed. Additionally, opposition against the selected coaching and mentoring process is also a notable example of organizational politics. There are various coaching and mentoring processes that are selected within organizations. Whereas people might support the operational team, they will oppose the chosen approach. Therefore, this also acts as an obstacle since it limits the operational team’s concentration. It is crucial to note that politics entails anything that concerns fulfilling personal or group interests. Therefore, there are also chances that a baseless opposition will develop against this process. The best example of an unfounded opposition is where others oppose coaching and mentoring without highlighting their main argument. Consequently, this diverts the operational team’s attention, and they lose their objective.  

Strategies to Overcome or Minimize the Operational Managers’ Issues 

Various strategies can help in managing operational managers' issues. First, creating effective communication within the organization will remove most of these issues. Effective communication is crucial in ensuring that everyone is informed about the selected coaches. Arguably, there are possibilities that the selected operational team might face opposition since other organizational members were never consulted. However, proper communication will ensure that they know the details and avoid future issues (Bird & Gornall, 2015). Furthermore, effective communication is also crucial to ensure that everyone in the organization knows about the coaching and mentoring method that they will apply. The main advantage of understanding the coaching and mentoring procedure is that they will not oppose later. It is crucial to create a platform before people air their views. Consequently, this reduces the chances of experiencing opposition after coaching and mentoring have started. Communication help in facing these oppositions much earlier. Immensely, facing opposition earlier helps in also seeking a solution earlier to ensure adequate coaching and mentoring. Therefore, this means that top management is responsible for any obstacle that the operational team will face. They must ensure that earlier communication is achieved for effective coaching and mentoring sessions.  

Second, the organization should also provide operational managers with enough resources to limit these limitations. The analysis indicates that limited resources also act as barriers. Therefore, the first solution is creating enough resources to fit the number of workers who intend to pass through coaching and mentoring. Moreover, it is also possible to limit the number of participants to ensure that it matches the current number of affordable resources (Clutterbuck & Megginson, 2016). The application of these strategies will enhance the chances of overcoming these obstacles since the operational managers will focus on all participants. All participants will manage to remain uniform in following instructions. Consequently, the operational team also manages to complete mentoring and coaching on time, proving that they have not faced any obstacles.  

Operational Areas Requiring Additional Support During the Adoption of Coaching and Mentoring 

Various operational areas might require support during mentoring and coaching to ensure that they help achieve the best. For instance, the resources segment of operations needs proper funding for the best results. Offering the resource department additional support will ensure that there is no straining. For instance, the operational managers will not have to strain to serve all participants (Garvey, 2017). The communication department is also an operational area that requires support for better coaching and mentoring process. Supporting the communication area will ensure that everyone gets information on time. Consequently, this will limit future oppositions against the operational team. Moreover, better communication will also minimize confusion amongst the participants.  

Method to Identify and Recognize Coaching and Mentoring Successes 

The paper has already identified some of the notable benefits of coaching and mentoring processes within an organization. However, it is unmeaningful to engage in coaching and mentoring without measuring the whole session's success. Identifying success or failure or a coaching process ensures operational managers make the right decisions in their subsequent operations. Therefore, a performance review is one of the best operational managers' methods to recognize coaching and mentorship success (Gray, 2016). Arguably, the need to enhance the participant's skills is one of the key reasons’ organizations engage in coaching and mentoring. Mainly, organizations believe that coaching and mentoring will better their team's performance since they have improved skills. Therefore, a performance review should compare the participant's performances before and after the mentoring and coaching sessions. A situation where the participant's performance has improved means that they have achieved success in the mentoring process. Arguably, the participant's performance can only improve if they gained knowledge through coaching (MacLennan, 2017). Contrary, the operational team will know that the coaching and mentoring process has failed if there is a decline in performance. Arguably, a decline in the participant's performance means that the coaching and mentoring sessions wasted their time and the little knowledge and skills they had already acquired. Moreover, there are also instances where the participants might not show an improvement or decline in performance. Therefore, this indicates that the coaching and mentoring sessions did not have anything new to learn and improve. Thus, this proves that the identified process is the best since it only concerns comparison. The operational team must create a mentorship and coaching practice that focuses on bettering the participants. 

A Strategy in Response to A Less Than Positive Coaching and Mentoring Experience 

It is crucial to state that coaching is always intended to provide positive results. However, some situations fail to provide coaching and mentoring with positive results. Failure to achieve positive requires the implementation of the right strategy to handle the situation. Therefore, the best approach will entail reviewing the previous coaching and mentoring process note the sources of error. Arguably, coaching and mentoring can only fail to grant positive results if it has errors (Merrick, 2018). Therefore, choosing to review the errors from a negative result enhances the chances of noting the issues during mentorship and coaching. Consequently, the strategy ensures an immediate solution to the problems identified to ensure that they grant positive results in the future. Arguably, failure to initiate this procedure means that they will have to adopt another and experience similar results. Coaching and mentoring is a learning process. These operational managers must remain ready to learn from their mistakes to ensure they achieve positive future practices.  

Furthermore, receiving less than positive results means that reviewing the past processes is the best method since it also enhances the chances of noting the operational team's strengths. Although there are instances where the operational team might register negative results, the reality is that they have strengths. Therefore, it is crucial to recognize these strengths to apply them better and enhance future performances (Parsloe & Leedham, 2016). The operational team will only gain information about their strength if they choose to review the previous process as the primary strategy in response to the less positive coaching and mentoring experience. Lastly, reviewing the previous coaching and mentoring process is the best response since it helps the participants to share their experiences. These participants are the ones who determine whether the results will emerge positive or negative. Therefore, they must share what they liked or disliked during the mentoring and coaching process.  

A Strategy to Monitor the Impact of Coaching and Mentoring Across the Organization 

Coaching and mentoring must have an impact on an organization. Arguably, coaching and mentoring might have a positive or negative effect on the organization. It is essential to note the impact of coaching and mentoring in an organization to understand its effectiveness. An effective coaching and mentoring process will ensure the achievement of positive results. Contrary, a failed coaching, and mentoring process result in a negative outcome. Therefore, a performance review is the best strategy in checking the impact of coaching and mentoring. A highlight regarding performance review is that it will help the organization understand whether or not the participants gained, and this depicts the impacts of coaching and mentoring.  

First, a highlight of positive performance means that the organization has positively impacted coaching and mentoring. It is only possible for any organization to achieve positive employee performance results if they have undergone proper coaching and mentoring. Arguably, providing the best coaching and mentoring processes will impact gaining the best skills (Serrat, 2017). Consequently, these employees apply their skills to their work, hence bettering performance. Performance review also focuses on the employee's attitude towards the organization and its performance. An employee who has passed through proper coaching and mentorship remains positive regarding the ability to improve. Therefore, this means that the coaching process has positively impacted these employees since they now believe in change.  

Second, if the participants show negative performance, the coaching and mentorship program has had a negative impact on the participants. Therefore, checking the impact of coaching through performance is also crucial since it depicts reality. For instance, participants might start dropping in performance since the applied coaching and mentorship programs are confusing. A confusing coaching and mentorship program also has a negative impact on participants. No organization intends to use a coaching and mentorship program that will impose negative effects on the participants. Performance is a critical factor in organizations because they should apply it to determine mentoring and coaching effectiveness.  

A Methodology for Operational Managers Who Under-Perform in Coaching and Mentoring 

There are instances where operational managers underperform. An operational manager is said to have underperformed if one fails to achieve the set goals. For example, the primary purpose of taking people through coaching and mentoring is to ensure that they have gained knowledge. However, some strategies help in dealing with operational managers who underperform. The creation of performance goals is the best approach in dealing with underperforming managers. Arguably, there are chances that these managers are underperforming since they do not understand the organization's goals. However, the creation of performance goals will enhance the chances of improving based on various factors. For instance, there are chances that these managers will improve in performance if granted these goals since they now understand the required expectations. Whereas a manager might have registered poor performances in the past, they will now struggle to meet the set target.  

Furthermore, creating performance goals will also enhance the chances of improving these underperforming managers' results since they will start to work harder in competition. The fact that these operational managers understand that there are targets is why they will choose to work harder. Consequently, they will improve in performance in their bid to achieve the set performance goals. Moreover, granting underperforming operational managers these goals ensures that they remain encouraged and work harder (Taylor & Crabb, 2017). Most people would expect that underperforming managers will face immediate dismissal from the company. However, the reality is that many factors might influence a manager to underperform. Therefore, granting a second chance to an underperforming manager might result in them giving their best. Subsequently, the last option is dismissal for underperforming operational managers if one fails to show improvement. The need to ensure that these managers can improve their performance is the reason for creating the performance goals. However, their use is limited for as long as they will prove an improvement in performance.  

A Methodology for Operational Managers Who Over-Perform in Coaching and Mentoring 

Coaching and mentoring set goals that the operational managers must meet. However, there are instances where operational managers outperform themselves by exceeding the expectations. Therefore, it is crucial to implement the best strategy for dealing with such operational managers. Markedly, granting promotion to overperforming managers is the best methodology. First, it is essential to grant these managers promotion to ensure that more are mentored and coached to improve performance. The organization needs to maintain the high performance for a long time. Therefore, offering a promotion to such an operational manager means that they will remain at the organization for a longer time. Subsequently, staying at the organization for a long time grants them a chance to coach and mentor more participants and benefit them. Therefore, promotion is the best approach to retaining overperforming managers.  

Promotion is still the best solution for overperforming managers to ensure that others are encouraged. The organization’s wish is to have multiple overperforming managers. Therefore, they must consider the right strategy that will attract operational managers to work and achieve overperformance. Offering promotion to the best operational managers means that others will also work hard to achieve similar promotions. The bid to achieve promotion is the one that will result in more overperforming managers (Algozzini & Gabay, 2017). These operational managers will work harder to earn promotions since they understand that it comes with salary increments. Furthermore, promotion is also the best methodology for overperforming managers for an organizational image. Each organization has an interest in earning and maintain a positive image. However, an organization’s image depends on the way it handles its employees. For instance, granting promotion to overperforming operational managers means that the organization appreciates its workers.  

Methods for The Strategic Managers to Demonstrate Overt Support for The Coaching and Mentoring Process 

There are different methods that strategic managers can engage in proving that they are offering support to coaching and mentoring processes. First, strategic managers should ensure enough resources to achieve a perfect mentoring and coaching process. One of the crucial factors that enhances the success of coaching and mentoring is the availability of resources. Therefore, strategic managers must provide the participants with enough resources. The providence of enough resources proves that they are supporting mentoring and coaching process since the participants have an easy time completing the process. Second, the strategic managers should also engage in regular talks with the participants to prove that they support coaching and mentoring. There are instances where the coaching and mentoring participants need encouragement. Therefore, strategic managers will prove that they are supporting the process by showing interest. Some participants who were almost giving up will earn motivation and continue with the coaching and mentorship program. 

Furthermore, strategic managers can also prove that they support coaching and mentoring by granting the participants qualified operational managers. It is wholly unrealistic to have underqualified coaches and claim that they are supporting the process. However, the providence of qualified participants to guide others means supporting them since they are interested in achieving the best results (Bird & Gornall, 2015). Lastly, strategic managers must also create effective communication within the organization. The creation of an effective communication system supports coaching and mentoring since there are reduced errors. The participants and operational managers manage to communicate and deliver everything on time. Therefore, strategic managers must always show support.  

Conclusion 

Operational managers face many obstacles in coaching and mentoring, and this includes a lack of enough resources and organizational politics, and proper planning and communication are the best solutions. The paper has provided a detailed analysis regarding coaching and mentorship. One of the notable highlights is that coaching and mentorship tend to experience different challenges. For instance, lack of enough resources is one of the significant barriers affecting operational managers. Nevertheless, the research also indicates that organizations can take different steps to ensure that these obstacles are removed. One of the best strategies is engaging in proper planning and review before starting the coaching process. Furthermore, the analysis also indicates that there are various actions that strategic managers can take to prove that they are supporting the coaching and mentoring process. The providence of enough coaching materials is the best support that strategic managers can offer. In brief, coaching and mentoring are easy with proper planning.  

Reference List 

Benefits of Coaching for Individuals, 2019. Benefits of Coaching for Individuals. [Online] Available at: https://www.insala.com/blog/6-benefits-of-coaching-for-individuals [Accessed 13 March 2021]. 

Algozzini, L. & Gabay, V., 2017. Group Coaching and Mentoring: A Framework for Fostering Organizational Change and Faculty Passion for Teaching Excellence. New York: GBA, Incorporated. 

Bird, J. & Gornall, S., 2015. The Art of Coaching: A Handbook of Tips and Tools. New York: Routledge. 

Clutterbuck, D. & Megginson, D., 2016. Building and Sustaining a Coaching Culture. Chicago: Kogan Page. 

Garvey, R., 2017. Coaching and Mentoring: Theory and Practice. Chicago: SAGE. 

Gray, D. E., 2016. A Critical Introduction to Coaching and Mentoring: Debates, Dialogues and Discourses. New York: SAGE. 

MacLennan, N., 2017. Coaching and Mentoring. Chicago: Taylor & Francis. 

Merrick, L., 2018. Benefits of Coaching, research and reality. [Online] Available at: https://www.coachmentoring.co.uk/blog/2018/10/benefits-of-coaching- research-reality/ [Accessed 4 March 2021]. 

Parsloe, E. & Leedham, M., 2016. Coaching and Mentoring: Practical Techniques for Developing Learning and Performance. New York: Kogan Page,. 

Serrat, O., 2017. Knowledge Solutions: Tools, Methods, and Approaches to Drive Organizational Performance. Chicago: Springer Singapore. 

Taylor, M. & Crabb, S., 2017. Business Coaching & Mentoring For Dummies. New York: John Wiley & Sons.