Introduction
Social responsibility can holistically be described as an ethical framework which depicts that an entity may it be an individual, or an organization is obligated to act or provide help to the society at large. This phenomenon is fundamental in the sense that through each individual’s actions a balance between the ecosystem and the economy is maintained. Additionally, good corporate social responsibility coupled with ethics allows the organization or company in question to take part or get involved with the real-life concerns or activities of its customers, employees, and stakeholders which when all combined form the society or community. For this paper, the organization of choice and involvement is Google.
According to Thompson (2017), Google mission statement is “to organize the world’s information and make it universally accessible and useful.” Ever since its establishment in 1998, Google has been loyal to its mission statement putting it at the top in the industry. Also, as part of its external communication, Google’s vision statement is “to provide access to the world’s information in one click” (Thompson, 2017). According to Google’s philosophy, users are the most fundamental part of the corporate social responsibility, and as such, they are considered a priority. Elaborately, the business philosophy asserts that the focus is on the user and everything else follows which is also part of the company’s communication. Since every product by the firm is developed with the user’s needs in mind, the company adequately addresses the social responsibility issue.
Delegate your assignment to our experts and they will do the rest.
Most people want and prefer to work for Google because of its success. Google employees form a fundamental part of the company enabling it to innovate rapidly. Employees, as one of the major stakeholders of the company, are subjected to a fun working environment as well as competitive compensation. In this accord, Google is by far a significant employer of choice for many individuals. Additionally, through the Google supplier code of conduct, the company looks into the working conditions of the suppliers’ employees. The conduct covers and addresses employment practices concerns as well as employees’ occupational health and safety. The company is not selective about its employees in regards to their race, sex or ethnicity: It incorporates different stakeholders such as users, customers, investors, customers, advertisers, the community, and government. Thus the aspect of diversity is well covered (Meyer, 2017).
In compliance with the government and its regulation, Google accepts applications for the disabled and readily accepts them as part of the society and employment force subjecting them to the same benefits and work environments as the rest of the workers. Therefore, Google acknowledges the disadvantaged and empathizes with them by providing employment and the special working environment. Moreover, Google believes in making money or profits without doing evil such as corruption and embezzlement thus maintaining high ethical standards. Regarding charity and giving back to the community, Google established a charity program through the Google.org that in return has given $100 million in investments and grants. The program is dedicated to addressing the climate change, global poverty, and global public health in the communities around the world. In addition, Google’s code of conduct is inclusive of the environmental ethics and standards which are in tandem with the company’s philosophy of making a profit without doing evil (Meyer, 2017).
Conclusion
Google upholds the ethical and social responsibilities significantly and can be rated as one of the best companies in this regard. The company gives back to the community and takes care of the environment by taking part in its conservation and maintenance. Hence, it scores perfectly in terms of social responsibility. Its philosophy of making money without taking part in wrongdoing, as well as compliance with the law, govern most of its operations thus keeping it above board ethically. However, the company is recommended to change its mission and vision statements in accordance with the new products and services it currently provides. In essence, both of the statements should reflect the diversification currently evident in the company as well as its future achievements all of which the old statements do not address (Thompson, 2017).
References
Meyer, P. (2017). Google Stakeholders & Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR). Panmore Institute. Retrieved from http://panmore.com/google-stakeholders-corporate-social-responsibility-csr-analysis
Thompson, A. (2017). Google’s Vision Statement & Mission Statement. Panmore Institute. Retrieved from http://panmore.com/google-vision-statement-mission-statement
