The presentation of compelling qualitative research requires the consideration of comprehensive evaluation and critique, especially based on the information outlined in the article under evaluation. However, the information regarding the perspective of patient safety in a diverse population does not really elaborate on the specificity of how language and cultural issues could either positively or negatively impact on healthcare organizations. Kattari et al. (2019), the article presents sensitive information that revolves around the exploration of linguistics and cultural barriers in modern hospitals, particularly in the developed nation. In this regard, matters of a diversity of nation's growth and the dominance of racial, cultural discriminations prove quite resourceful for evaluation in this quantitative research.
Qualitative research evaluation and critique
Article selected
Kattari, S. K., Atteberry-Ash, B., Kinney, M. K., Walls, N. E., & Kattari, L. (2019). One size does not fit all: differential transgender health experiences. Social Work in Health Care , 58 (9), 899-917.
Delegate your assignment to our experts and they will do the rest.
| Areas for consideration | Criteria for critique | Evaluation of Criteria |
| Title of the study | Capture both clarity and significance of the study | (Kattary et al. 2019), the article captures the clarity of the research understudy in a more comprehensive manner. In view of their thoughts in the article, it comes out quite sensible that the perspective of meeting diverse cultures in global healthcare programs is awarded the requisite attention. Conversely, the perception of Kattary and his colleagues in the article are quite inconsistent, especially on the basis of patient safety in a diverse population (Cherian et al., 2019). In this context, the authors to dot reveal the platform under which issues of racial and poor health impact on a diverse population. |
| Author credentials | Capture both strengths and weaknesses of the sources used for conducting research | For any kind of study, especially in a report that details qualitative research and critique, author credentials should capture every sense of the argument. The article is quite relevant by capturing diverse thoughts of a variety of authors |
| Purpose of the study |
Significance of the problem noted Clarification of the aim of the study Practicality of study Clarity, significance, and documentation |
The prime purpose of any study that details qualitative research and evaluation should be presented in a format that entails the significance of the problem. In this case, Kattary’s case, the significance of the problem is not well articulated. In this regard, Phillips (2019) observes that issues that involve language and cultural issues do not reflect the reasoning for which the research was conducted, and this is entirely based on the practicality and the need to protect patients in diverse cultures. |
| Content of the literature review |
Organization of literature Progression toward study question through previous research reports Rationale and direction for the study presented |
The content of the literature review seems to be well organized in the article. However, there exists inconsistent progression, especially on the matter of exploration of cultural barriers (Schmidt et al., 2018). The literature review selected to guide in the completion of research does not articulate the sense of uniqueness of patient safety in a diverse population, especially in the developing nations, and this disregards the rationale upon which the older sources were considered. |
| Theory and framework in connection with the concept of healthcare and nursing |
Clear link between conceptual framework and/or theory and research question and/or purpose Any maps and models logically presented |
There should be clarity, particularly in showing the connections of conceptual frameworks and the models selected in a bid to provide unbiased information and outline the purpose of research to the humanity (Schaefer & Alvesson, 2020). In this article, the fact that the theory of the research question connects with the purpose of the research that investigates patient safety in a diverse population is outlined the basis upon which models were theories that entail the exploration of different cultures do not seem to champion for effective approaches in healthcare. |
| Research questions/hypothesis |
Expressed appropriately and clearly Logically related to the research purpose or aim and framework and/or theory |
In view of this article, it is quite apparent that the research questions do not really connect the aim of the study on the basis thatthey only focus on the healthcare needs of the diverse population but not on the question of a diversity of a growing nation (Schmidt et al., 2018). |
| Dependent and independent variables captured in the research |
Concepts identified within the framework and/or theory used Variables operationally defined A conceptual definition consistent with the operational definition of each variable |
Variables that are considered for the evaluation of qualitative research need to be operationally defined in a bid to contain the possibilities of miss information to the targeted persons (Fain, 2017). In view of the article under evaluation, concepts of patient safety in a diverse population, especially in the developed nation, are captured. This shows that the conceptual definition is consistent with the operational definition. |
| Data gathering techniques |
Method appropriate to result in a representative sample Biases identified Human rights protected The setting described and appropriate for the target population |
The fact that the article targets the developing nations means that the setting is most appropriate for the sample population. Therefore, there is no need per se for bias. |
| Considerations of ethics in the study |
Interrater reliability described when appropriate The process clearly, consistently, and ethically described |
The data collected for this study seems to protect the rights of humanity on the basis that it calls for building a foundation in the healthcare industry for reasons of promoting cultural competence and leadership. |
| Data collection procedures |
Instruments sufficient for measuring the study variables Instrument validity and reliability levels Instrument scoring techniques clearly described |
The descriptive data collection techniques used for this particular study depict the fact that information is quite abstract. Therefore, it could not be solely relied upon as peer-reviewed. |
| Data analysis |
Procedures suitable for the type of data collected Analysis procedures clearly portrayed Outcomes offered in a comprehensible way |
The fact that data collection techniques were quite abstract, especially on the methodologies, portrays the fact that the outcome would not be comprehensive. |
| Results/recommendations and implications in nursing and healthcare studies |
At the final stages of qualitative research, it is in order to outline both the positive and negative effects of the title under study. implications that may arise in the future are contained before the hazardous effects are felt by humanity |
The fact that the articles advocates for policy implementation with solid reasoning to improve services calls for future adjustment and concentration in this particular research. |
Conclusion
It is worth noting that the article focuses on transcultural health experiences that typically denote the essence of patient safety in a diverse population (Cherian et al., 2019). Hence, in as much as the article did not prove quite authentic, particularly on the basis of collaboration of healthcare institution to liberate the affected persons, it is still open for future research and further discussions on the issues of collecting data with a purpose of improving healthcare services not only in the developed nations but also across the globe.
References
Cherian, R., Sarkar, U., Khoong, E. C., Ackerman, S., Gourley, G., & Schillinger, D. (2019). Standardization in Diverse Populations: Implementation of Evidence-Based Practices in a Safety-Net Setting. HLRP: Health Literacy Research and Practice , 3 (1), e43-e46.
Fain, J. A. (2017). Reading, understanding, and applying nursing research . FA Davis.
Schaefer, S. M., & Alvesson, M. (2020). Epistemic attitudes and source critique in qualitative research. Journal of Management Inquiry , 29 (1), 33-45.
Kattari, S. K., Atteberry-Ash, B., Kinney, M. K., Walls, N. E., & Kattari, L. (2019). One size does not fit all: differential transgender health experiences. Social Work in Health Care , 58 (9), 899-917.
Phillips, J. M., Stalter, A. M., Dolansky, M. A., & Lopez, G. M. (2016). Fostering future leadership in quality and safety in health care through systems thinking. Journal of Professional Nursing , 32 (1), 15-24.
Schmidt, T. M., Liu, L. I., Abraham, I. E., Uy, A. B., & Dudek, A. Z. (2018). Efficacy and safety of Sorafenib in a racially diverse patient population with advanced hepatocellular carcinoma. Anticancer research , 38 (7), 4027-4034.
