Section 1: What do people spend money on that they either don't need or rarely use other than those things mentioned by Singer?
Peter Singer acknowledges a need as a fundamental aspect to existing. Things should only be purchased because of the demands of their uses instead of their principles. Your wants but not luxuries should just consume resources. Once a purpose equals your request, you should not purchase a different one. He recognizes that cars and computers are the requirements but owning an extravagance car, and the latest machine is irrelevant. Basing on his approach to the unfortunate, he should be a functionalist and believe in the practical examination. The useful summary is a plan, which the community is a complete system composed of interrelated subsystems that operate concurrently. The functioning section of the society, such as the wealthy personalities should support the underprivileged and manage the world's equality. As we live in a capitalist society, it is definite hat money is the dominant factor in our daily lives. Money should be squandered on leisure because it has a reasonable capacity to make changes in the society.
Delegate your assignment to our experts and they will do the rest.
Section 2: Why does Macedo claim that cosmopolitan distributive justice "makes no sense"?
I do agree with Macedo since most of the ideals are centered towards individualism and administering a multicultural distributive justice might prove futile. Boundaries are substantially meaningful because they bound policies of mutual self-governance. Also, engaging collectively in governing a liberal society is an essential ethical relationship. Human beings are born within national organizations, and they are ones who created them. The society is shaped by the shared ideals that are inbuilt from the time an individual grows. These characteristics are what govern a liberal society since, at any given time, accountability and collective responsibilities result in prosperity. Nationals have great duties of common interest and regard one another because all are united mutually in building necessary political systems. So, it makes no reason to believe in international distributive justice if there is no federal state or political association. And how could we argue that citizens are morally accountable for the welfare of others if we are not also responsible for their governance? Therefore, efficiency for health, education, prosperity originates from government.
