Introduction
In virtually all industries, one would establish that certain companies perform better than other firms. There remains nearly all the time a unique company. For instance, in the automotive sector, Toyota is viewed as a better player. Also, Amazon is a leader in clean online selling, while Walmart, the leading trader worldwide, is the lead in off-line trade. Furthermore, Google is regarded as the frontrunner in Web search. Companies that “perform better” than other firms are believed to possess a competitive advantage against other firms: These companies either have access to unusual assets which other firms don’t, or they are capable of using generally obtainable assets more effectively—typically due to better information and knowledge resources. Anyhow, these firms perform better with regard to returns growth, efficiency, profitability, which eventually in the long-run implies greater stock market estimates than their rivals. The current paper seeks to analyze the way Porter’s competitive forces model assists firms in developing competitive strategies through the use of information systems.
Porter’s Competitive Forces Model
Debatably, Michael Porter’s competitive forces model is the most commonly applied model for comprehending competitive advantage. The model offers an overall view of a company, its environment, as well as its competitors. Porter’s competitive forces model is all about a company’s universal business environment (Grundy, 2006). Generally, 5 competitive forces determine the firm’s fate in this model.
Delegate your assignment to our experts and they will do the rest.
The first force is the traditional competitors. Every company shares bazaar space with the competitors who are constantly inventing fresh, more effective methods to manufacture through the introduction of new services and products and make an effort to draw consumers by advancing their products and charging fluctuating costs on their consumers (Porter, 2008).
The second force is the New Market Entrants. New firms are constantly inflowing the bazaar within an open economy having mobile labor and monetary resources (Grundy, 2006). Within certain sectors, there exist extremely small barriers to entrance, while in others; entrance is excessive challenging (Porter, 2008). For example, it is relatively stress-free to set up a pizza firm or virtually any small enterprise, nonetheless, it is considerably more challenging and costlier to venture the computer chip industry that has extremely high capital expenses and necessitates substantial knowledge and expertise which is problematic to find (Dälken, 2014). Fresh firms have a number of potential benefits: they normally employ younger employees who are possibly more innovative and less costly; they aren’t locked into outdated equipment and plants; they aren’t burdened by old-dated worn-out product titles, and they are more greatly motivated than the industry’s old occupants (Grundy, 2006). However, these merits are similarly their drawbacks: They rely on external funding for new equipment and plants, which may be costly; they have pintsize brand acknowledgement, and they possess a less-skilled staff.
The third force is the substitute services and products. In practically all industries, there exist alternatives which the consumers can utilize if the prices of a firm become excessively high (Grundy, 2006). Novel technologies generate new alternatives continually. For instance, substitutes of oil include: Ethanol may stand in for gasoline in automobiles; vegetable oil can substitute for diesel fuel in Lorries; and hydropower solar, wind, and coal for production of industrial electricity. Similarly, fiber-optic phone lines may stand in for cable television lines, and the Internet phone service may stand in for typical telephone service. The more alternative services and products in the industry, the less a company may regulate pricing and the lesser the profit margins of a firm (Karagiannopoulos, Georgopoulos & Nikolopoulos, 2005).
The fourth force is Customers. A profit-making firm depends greatly on its capability to draw and keep clients (and at the same time denying them to rivals), and impose high prices (Porter, 2008). The consumers’ power increases in case they could without difficulty shift to a rival’s services and products, or in case they could compel a firm and its rivals to contest on price only in a clear bazaar in which there exists small product differentiation, and entire charges are identified instantly (for instance, online) (Grundy, 2006). As an illustration, in the secondhand university textbook bazaar online, learners (buyers) may find numerous sellers of almost any existing university textbook. Within this situation, customers on the internet have unusual power against secondhand-book companies.
The last force is suppliers. The suppliers’ market power may have a major effect on the profits of an organization, particularly if the company is unable to increase prices as speedily as the suppliers can (Grundy, 2006). The more diverse suppliers a company possesses, the bigger control it could impose against suppliers with regard to quality, price, as well as delivery timetables (Porter, 2008). For example, producers of laptop computers virtually all the time have numerous competing providers of main elements, like display screens, hard drives, and keyboards.
Information System Strategies for tackling Competitive Forces
When a company is challenged by all the five competitive forces, the question arises about what it can do, and the manner in which the firm may utilize information systems to counter these forces. There exist 4 generic strategies, which usually are enabled through the use of information systems and technology (Cadle & Yeates, 2004). They include product differentiation, low-cost leadership, strengthening supplier and customer intimacy, as well as focus on bazaar niche.
Regarding low-cost leadership, the firm may employ information systems to realize the lowermost costs of operation as well as the lowermost prices (Galliers & Leidner, 2014). A perfect illustration is Walmart. The firm, by retaining prices low and shelves properly-stocked through the use of the legendary inventory replenishment system, it grew into the largest retail business in America. Its unbroken replenishment system orders fresh stock directly from suppliers immediately customers pay for the acquisitions at the cashbox. Checkout terminuses document the bar code of individual element passing via the till counter and transmit a buying deal straight to a principal processer at Walmart head office. Then, the PC gathers every order from entire Walmart shops and sends them to providers. Also, suppliers may access inventory and sales figures of Walmart by means of Web technology. Since the system restocks inventory with whirlwind pace, the firm does not require to expend much cash on keeping huge records of commodities in its storeroom. Also, the system allows Walmart to modify acquisitions of store objects to satisfy consumer demands. Players, like Sears, have been using about twenty-five percent of sales return on overhead. On the other hand, through the use of systems to retain costs of operation low, Walmart spends just 16.6 percent of sales returns for overhead (Ives & Learmonth, 1984). Its unbroken replenishment system is similarly an illustration of the effective consumer response system, which directly connects customer behavior to production and distribution as well as supply chains.
The second strategy is product differentiation. The firm can utilize information systems to allow new services and goods, or significantly alter the consumer convenience in utilizing its existing services and goods (Hemmatfar, Salehi & Bayat, 2010). For example, Google endlessly presents a novel and inimitable search service on its Website, for instance, Google Maps. Also, in the year 2003, eBay, by acquiring PayPal, an electronic compensation system, made it considerably simpler for consumers to compensate suppliers and extended utilization of its sale bazaar. Apple generated the iPod, an inimitable transportable digital music player, along with an exceptional online Web music service in which music may be bought for about 0.69-1.29 USD each (Dälken, 2014. Apple has carried on innovating its hypermedia iPhone, iPod video player, and iPad tablet CPU.
Retailers and manufacturers are utilizing information systems to create services and goods which are personalized and customized to suit the exact specifications of specific consumers (Cadle & Yeates, 2004). For instance, Nike firm retails personalized sneakers via its NIKEiD platform on the company’s Website. Consumers are capable of selecting the kind of shoe, outsoles, material, colors, and an emblem of not more than eight characters. The company sends orders through processers to uniquely-equipped plants in Korea and China. The shoes cost just ten USD more and take roughly 3 weeks before reaching the buyer. This capability of offering individually custom-made services or goods by use of unchanged production resources as mass manufacturing is known as mass customization (Galliers & Leidner, 2014).
The third strategy is focused on a market niche. A firm can utilize information systems to facilitate a precise bazaar focus, and attend to this thin target marketplace in a better way than competitors (Hemmatfar, Salehi & Bayat, 2010). Information systems facilitate this strategy through generation and analysis of information for excellently modified marketing and sales methods. Information systems allow firms to assess consumer purchasing preferences, tastes, and patterns carefully so that they effectively pitch marketing and advertising movements to narrower and narrower target marketplaces (Rowley, 1994).
The information originates from a variety of sources such as demographic information, credit card dealings, buying records from till counter scanners at retail shops and supermarkets, as well as information gathered when persons access and interrelate with Websites (Ives & Learmonth, 1984). Refined software instruments discover patterns within these huge pools of information and deduce guidelines from them to direct decision-making. Assessment of that kind of information pushes one-to-one advertising which generates individual messages grounded in customized likings. Hilton Hotels’ system OnQ, for instance, examines comprehensive information gathered on active visitors in each of its hotels to identify the likings of individual visitor and individual visitor’s profitability. The firm utilizes this data to provide its greatest profitable consumers with added privileges, for instance, late check-outs. Modern customer relationship management systems present analytical abilities for such intensive information assessment (Laudon & Laudon, 2015).
Interactive session on companies defines how competently credit card corporations are capable of using focus on market niche strategy to guess their greatest profitable card owners. The firms collect huge amounts of information regarding customer buying in addition to other behaviors and extract this information to create in-depth profiles which pinpoint cardholders who could be bad or good credit risks (Laudon & Laudon, 2015). These exercises have boosted the profitability of credit card corporations.
The fourth strategy is to Strengthen Supplier and Consumer Intimacy. The company can utilize information systems to make tighter relationships with providers and grow closeness with consumers (Ives & Learmonth, 1984). For instance, Chrysler Firm employs information systems to enable direct access by providers to manufacturing timetables, and even allows the providers to choose the way and the time to distribute materials to Chrysler shops, thus allowing providers more advance notice in generating commodities. Furthermore, on the side of the consumer, Amazon.com records consumer preferences for CD and book procurements and may recommend labels acquired by other persons to its clients. Robust connections to suppliers and clients upsurge substitution costs (the cost of substituting a good to a competing good), and customer loyalty to the company. Certain firms center on a single strategy, nonetheless, other firms pursue a number of them concurrently (Rowley, 1994). For instance, Dell attempts to highlight low cost in addition to the capability of customizing its personal processers.
Internet and competitive advantage
Thanks to the Internet, the typical competitive powers are still working; nonetheless, competitive opposition has turn into considerably stronger. Internet knowhow is grounded in general standards which any corporation may apply, making it effortless for competitors to contest on price only and for fresh rivals to join the marketplace (Bocij, Greasley & Hickie, 2008). Since information is obtainable to every person, the Internet increases the consumers’ bargaining power, who may speedily discover the lowermost-cost supplier online. Proceeds of the firms have been diminished. Certain sectors, like the monetary services sector and the tourism sector, have been more affected than other industries (Daniels & Nolan, 1994). Nevertheless, the Internet similarly generates novel opportunities for forming brands and forming extremely huge and loyal consumer centers, for instance, Google, eBay, and Yahoo!
The company may apply the business value chain model to pinpoint sections in which information systems would enhance business processes (Hemmatfar, Salehi & Bayat, 2010). Also, the company may benchmark its business processes against its rivals and ascertain and apply the sector’s best practices (Laudon & Laudon, 2015). Benchmarking entails matching the effectiveness and efficiency of a company’s business processes against firm canons and then gauging performance against these canons. The sector best practices are normally established by research corporations, consulting firms, government organizations, as well as sector associations since the greatest effective resolutions or problem-solving techniques for efficiently and consistently accomplishing a business goal.
Information systems may be utilized to attain strategic advantage through collaborating with other companies to form sector-wide principles for sharing info or business dealings by electronic means, which compel every market participant to subscribe to alike canons (Cadle & Yeates, 2004). Those kinds of efforts upsurge productivity, making commodity switching less likely increasing entry costs.
Internet know-how has made it imaginable to form greatly harmonized sector value chains known as value webs (a group of autonomous companies that utilize information technology to synchronize their value chains to create a service or good for the bazaar jointly) (Bocij, Greasley & Hickie, 2008). Value web is more consumer-focused and functions in a less lined style than a typical value chain. A huge company is normally a group of companies. Information systems may boost the general performance of the business divisions by encouraging synergies in addition to core abilities (Daniels & Nolan, 1994).
In a nutshell, the typical Porter’s competitive model forces assume a comparatively fixed industry setting; comparatively definite industry borders; and a comparatively steady set of customers, substitutes, and suppliers. With the advent of the Internet and the digital company, certain adjustments to the initial competitive forces model are required. Several companies of today are considerably more mindful that they take part in business environments, lightly attached but interdependent systems of distributors, suppliers, transport service companies, outsourcing companies, plus technology producers.
References
Bocij, P., Greasley, A., & Hickie, S. (2008). Business information systems: Technology, development and management . Pearson education.
Cadle, J., & Yeates, D. (Eds.). (2004). Project management for information systems . Pearson education.
Dälken, F. (2014). Are Porter’s five competitive forces still applicable? A critical examination concerning the relevance for today’s business (Bachelor's thesis, University of Twente).
Daniels, N. C., & Nolan, R. L. (1994). Information technology: The management challenge . New York: Addison-Wesley.
Galliers, R. D., & Leidner, D. E. (2014). Strategic information management: challenges and strategies in managing information systems . Routledge.
Grundy, T. (2006). Rethinking and reinventing Michael Porter's five forces model. Strategic Change , 15 (5), 213-229.
Hemmatfar, M., Salehi, M., & Bayat, M. (2010). Competitive advantages and strategic information systems. International Journal of Business and Management , 5 (7), 158.
Ives, B., & Learmonth, G. P. (1984). The information system as a competitive weapon. Communications of the ACM , 27 (12), 1193-1201.
Karagiannopoulos, G. D., Georgopoulos, N., & Nikolopoulos, K. (2005). Fathoming Porter's five forces model in the internet era. info , 7 (6), 66-76.
Laudon, K. C., & Laudon, J. P. (2015). Management Information Systems: Managing the Digital Firm Plus MyMISLab with Pearson eText--Access Card Package . Prentice Hall Press.
Porter, M. E. (2008). The five competitive forces that shape strategy. Harvard business review , 86 (1), 25-40.
Rowley, J. (1994). Strategic management information systems and techniques . Blackwell Publishers
