After accomplishing the “Protecting Human Research Participants” course, I was surprised by the past incidences that motivated the development and execution of ethical practices. The historical occurrences can be described as regrettable. In my view, the course was founded on shared knowledge and ethical perspectives. However, several issues were unknown to me before undertaking the course including emergency studies, community consultation, and diminished autonomy.
Diminished autonomy was to me a new notion that I had not pondered about before. While I understood the significance of both adult and child consent, I was surprised to learn that other individuals including the cognitively disadvantaged, the mentally unstable, and patients in comatose should be encouraged to provide their consent or participate in their health improvements. Before the NIH course, I did not know the significance of community consultation. Finally, through the module, I learned of the importance of seeking consent from human subjects even in emergency researches conducted by international organizations such as the CDC (Center for Disease Control and intervention) (Grove, Burns, Gray, 2013).
Delegate your assignment to our experts and they will do the rest.
According to my company’s website (Davita Dialysis Company’s website), the organization has an extensive team of researchers based in over 250 subsidiaries (DaVita Clinical Research, 2018). The group of researchers includes federally approved and experienced physicians who conduct studies in subjects at all stages of kidney disorders. Among the researchers include Dr. Stephen Zale Fadem, (America’s Top Doctor) (DaVita Clinical Research, 2018). The care facility also has an IRB (Institutional Review Board) that caters to subjects at various stages of CKD (chronic kidney disease) (DaVita Clinical Research, 2018). The IRB members are professionally qualified individuals from diverse backgrounds who have the responsibility to evaluate, appraise, execute, and monitor detailed examinations as required by the facility (DaVita Clinical Research, 2018). The IRB is supposed to protect and accordingly advice the study subjects and review the proposed study designed to determine whether they seek participant’s consent, educate them on the available participation options, and provide information on potential risks (Fain, 2017) .
References
DaVita Clinical Research. (2018). Renal Research Site Network - DaVita Clinical Research. Retrieved July 23, 2018, from https://www.davitaclinicalresearch.com/
Fain, J. A. (2017). Reading, understanding, and applying nursing research . FA Davis.
Grove, S., Burns, N., Gray, J. (2013). The Practice of Nursing Research: Appraisal, Synthesis, and Generation of Evidence, 7th Edition. [VitalSource Bookshelf Online]. Retrieved from https://digitalbookshelf.southuniversity.edu/#/books/978-1-4557-0736-2/ .
