Pseudoscience type claims are the ideas that look like science, but they are not as they may fail in one aspect or another in science. Pseudoscience claims have been accepted as no kind of evidence can refute it. The difference between science and pseudoscience is that science is based on proven facts, while the pseudoscience is made of the false idea that is not based on facts but only on beliefs and practices (Zaboski & Therriault , 2020). People tend to believe the pseudoscience claims in one way or another, but there is no proof of what they believe.
People are more attracted to strange and unexplained things. They love to explore, and they want everything quick and delivered to them without so much struggle. Therefore, pseudoscience claims are straightforward claims to be made, and people believe them ( McIntyre, 2019). A good example is when people claim that Santa brought them goodies during Christmas. This is a pseudoscience claim that cannot be proven as during Christmas, it is parents who used to place the gifts outside the doors, and when the children woke up, they believe that it was Santa. This claim has been there for the longest time, and it has been passed from generation to generation, and somehow, we have all come to believe it.
Delegate your assignment to our experts and they will do the rest.
A second example is the superstitions that people were taught as children and they still hold onto them. As a child, some people were told that when they see a black cat crossing their paths, that is a bad omen, and they have grown to believe that claim (Hannson,2018). And they pass it to their children believing that it was true because they would not imagine that something, they have heard all their lives is a lie. These two claims do not meet the rigorous scientific methodology standards as they have not been scientifically proven to be true. They are considered a pseudoscience because they look like science, but they are just myths and beliefs.
The material discussed this week had changed my thinking as far as having to analyze more the information I receive and critically think and evaluate the information to determine if it is true or false. The material has also helped me to be able to form new habits that would support my mindset and what I believe in. I am now better positioned to analyze any information only to feed my mind what actual science and not pseudoscience is.
References
Hansson, S. O. (2018). Dealing with climate science denialism: experiences from confrontations with other forms of pseudoscience. Climate Policy , 18 (9), 1094-1102.
McIntyre, L. (2019). The scientific attitude: defending science from denial, fraud, and pseudoscience . MIT Press.
Zaboski, B. A., & Therriault, D. J. (2020). Faking science: scientificness, credibility, and belief in pseudoscience. Educational Psychology , 40 (7), 820-837.
