Research proposals are an important aspect of enhancing the research process prior to execution. The planning enables a researcher to anticipate for challenges that may be encountered while conducting the research. However, the accuracy of the research proposal is key to success. In the research proposal on the most efficacious therapeutic regimen for Posttraumatic Stress Disorder (PTSD), the researcher begins by clearly defining the problem the research is trying to tackle. The problem being to ascertain the long-term remedy for PTSD patients as some of the most common therapeutic regimens was proving to be quite ineffective.
On the literature review, the researcher clearly did an in-depth analysis of the matter. The literature also conforms to the task at hand as it embarks on the rot posed by ineffective regimens including; a deteriorated immune system, insomnia, resistance to insulin, obesity, a high affinity of being diagnosed with diabetes II. The literature review will therefore form a basis of reference to the research process. The presentation of the hypothesis could not have been clearer than presented in this research proposal. It is imperative that the research clearly comprehend the subject under study as it is the foundation for building an effective research design. Failure to understand the hypothesis clearly leads to generalized research techniques that bear no fruits. In contrast to this, the researcher did an impeccable job in imposing the hypothesis.
Delegate your assignment to our experts and they will do the rest.
The author then proceeds to recommend a qualitative analysis on the matter which is accurately appropriate to the study. Three studies are proposed on patients with PTSD, using sertraline or paroxetine alone on the patient, combining it with pharmacologic agent and patients with only treatment on psychology. A qualitative analysis on these individuals would therefore shed light on plans that are the most effective. However, I propose the combination of both quantitative and qualitative analysis to enhance the quality of the results depicted. Stratified random sampling as utilized in the proposal is effective to this research plan. However, I would recommend that healthcare professions also be included in the study as they have a hands-on access to their patients. Aside from this, the methods of collecting data were up to par. Administering questionnaires does allow for analysis of perceptions by the participants and describes a behavior. Unfortunately, the author presents no substantial evidence to ascertain that the research would be voluntary. Forcing individuals to participate in a study prior to their consent is in breach of ethical considerations. Caution should therefore be observed to ensure that confirmation is first requested before a questionnaire is administered to a patient. In addition to this, the study should not in any way whatsoever interfere with service delivery to PTSD patients and cause deterioration in the health of a patient.
Generally, the researcher did an impeccable task in preparing the research proposal, sources were thoroughly perused, effective techniques assigned and the overall presentation was comprehensible and clear. The formatting was also accurate including the citation for the various sources evaluated. The proposal will therefore offer a splendid foundation with which to execute the research. However, success will only be achieved if a strict adherence to the proposal is observed while observing time management. The research could also be prolonged to account for any arising issues, matters that were not anticipated, and effective restructure of the research questions.
