Contrasting strengths and weaknesses of group decision making.
Effective teamwork is efficient in cases where individuals work in harmony and combine their efforts towards the achievement of a common goal (Blokdyk, 2018). In group decision making, individuals are involved in making decisions after scrutinizing the alternatives that are posed to them. Finally, the decision made is attributed to the whole group due to contribution from all members. The process of group decision making is associated with a couple of strengths. However, several weaknesses are also part of the process.
In terms of strengths, there are beneficial qualities that can be attributed to efficient group decision making. First, creativity and innovativeness are the most important strengths in collective decision making. There is sharing of knowledge thus quality decisions are made. In addition, new and better ideas are encouraged. Secondly, there is the increase in morale when decisions in a workplace or any other group of people are made collectively. Increased communication between members leads to a sharing of each other’s experiences. As a result, there is increased knowledge in the creation of solutions to a problem by the members. Lastly, there is a utilization of expert opinion in the process. During critical times, some group decisions require an expert opinion. Experts are included in the process to generate their opinion that affects the generation of the final decision. They are very imperative during these times (Blokdyk, 2018).
Delegate your assignment to our experts and they will do the rest.
Contrary to the strengths of collective decision making are the weaknesses that come along with the process. First, the process creates some inter-personal conflicts. Disagreements that emanate from arguments lead to conflicts and the inability to reach a common decision. Likewise, there is a lack of individual responsibility in case a group decision fails to meet its purpose or goal. Since the decision made was a collective one, no one claims responsibility if its implementation fails. Finally, there is the compromise of individual opinions after group decisions are reached (Blokdyk, 2018).
Reference
Blokdyk, G. (2018). Group Decision-Making. The Ultimate Step-By-Step Guide. Clermont: Michelin Publishers.
