Item 1: The colonial relationship to the British before/after the French and Indian War
The warfare between the two nations made a more significant impact on the relationship worsening it further. In short, it can be stated that the warfare between the two states acted as a pathway to the revolution (Maier, 1991). Notably, the war made the French flee North America. Hence, the colonists had no fear in case the French broke their ties with Britain. The war had used a lot of finances.
Item 2: The acts passed by the British government
The British government had some of the bills that it passed. For instance, there was the “Quartering Act (1765)”. The act had an impact on the colonies because they would offer supplies to the barracks and the houses. Also, the supplies would be transported to the stations for the British troops in America. A greater number of the American often thought that the British Army made them feel tied so much by their presence. Hence, the act was resented. Secondly, there was the “Currency Act (1764)”. The act made the controls over the paper money that the colonies used. The act was formed to safeguard the merchants and money-lenders and avoid depreciated payments using the colonial currencies (Countryman, 2003). Thirdly, the “Stamp Act (1765)” was passed by the Parliament in America which was responsible for the taxation of college diplomas, advertisements, legal documents, and licenses.
Delegate your assignment to our experts and they will do the rest.
Item 3: The grievances stated in the Declaration of Independence
In June 1776 Thomas Jefferson wrote the Declaration of Independence. The acquisition of the declaration was the starting point of having a sovereign nation- the United States (Wills, 2018). The grievances were directed to King George III. The complaints directly quoted included from the declaration were:
“ He has refused his Assent to Laws, the most wholesome and necessary for the public good.”
The complaint meant that King George III had declined to pass some laws. For instance, the rules that addressed people's accommodation. He forbade his representatives in the form of governors not to give any critical law unless he intervenes if necessary. What the case meant was that he was the one who had the approval of all the rules that he could neglect.
“ He has refused to pass other Laws for the accommodation of large districts of people unless those people would relinquish the right of Representation in the Legislature, a right inestimable to them and formidable to tyrants only.”
There was a large population that grew and that new communities were established. The king failed in offering the population a greater representation and inclusion in the government. The king needed no consent. Notably, people’s right is the appropriate and the most effective when it requires government representation.
“ He has called together legislative bodies at places unusual, uncomfortable, and distant from the depository of their public Records, for the sole purpose of fatiguing them into compliance with his measures.”
The complaint involved the inability of the colonial governors to access vital information for public business. The people’s consent was that the assemblies would have full information access.
“ He has dissolved Representative Houses repeatedly, for opposing with manly firmness his invasions on the rights of the people.”
The king failed in some decisions because whenever there were harsh charges he faced, he ensured that the whole set of governance was dissolved and no charges would be successful against him. There is a need for appropriate balances and checks within the government.
“ He has refused for a long time, after such dissolutions to cause others to be elected; whereby the Legislative powers, incapable of Annihilation, have returned to the People at large for their exercise; the State remaining in the mean time exposed to all the dangers of invasion from without, and convulsions within.”
The king disallowed new selections of government representatives the following dissolution. The law is brief that no person has the right to perform rulings without their consent.
“ He has endeavored to prevent the population of these States; for that purpose obstructing the Laws for Naturalization of Foreigners; refusing to pass others to encourage their migration hither, and raising the conditions of new Appropriations of Lands.”
The grievance was about the decisions of the king regarding immigration. He blocked immigration processes from England and denied to work towards the growth and the success of the colonies. What the government should do is to ensure that unused land is easily accessible to the nationals.
“ He has obstructed the Administration of Justice, by refusing his Assent to Laws for establishing Judiciary powers.”
The king would accept no judiciary to be set up. He did not allow the judgment of criminals by the colonies or perform any redress. The judiciary helps in the security of life and property.
Item 4: The events that escalated the division between the Crown and the colonists.
The significant events constituted the Stamp Act that caused unfair taxations. Nonetheless, there were extreme acts that made the Americans angry and made them boycott some of the products Britain offered. Additionally, the British troops were cruel towards the Americans.
In conclusion, the British King thought that the colonists were behaving similarly to spoiled children. The colonists’ thoughts were that the British were ignoring what they grieved about, overtaxing and overbearing.
References
Armitage, D. (2007). The declaration of independence: A global history. Harvard University Press.
Countryman, E. (2003). The American Revolution. Hill and Wang.
Maier, P. (1991). From Resistance to Revolution: Colonial Radicals and the development of American opposition to Britain, 1765-1776. WW Norton & Company.
Wills, G. (2018). Inventing America: Jefferson's Declaration of Independence. Vintage.
