Introduction
The release of hundreds of thousands of inmates into our neighborhoods with little or no rehabilitation is putting our families and communities in danger (Ganapathy, 2018) . American neighborhoods are in danger because the released inmates not only have limited education and occupational skills but also without the patience and ability required to settle disagreements lawfully, and also without acceptable concern for the safety of others (Fox & Grimm, 2013) . Many prisoners in the criminal justice system have not been adequately prepared for life after prisons. Fighting crime is among the top priorities for any developing and developed country’s internal affairs (Gideon & Sung, 2010) . Crime is not only disastrous in representing high monetary costs to society and causing insecurity but also the lowering of a country’s social capital (Gideon & Sung, 2010) . The cost of crime in the United States is estimated to be between $700 billion $3.5 trillion, and there are inaccuracies in the estimate because of the difficulties involved in determining the intangible costs of crime (Ganapathy, 2018) .
Prisons in the United States are currently undergoing reforms, and the context surrounding the purpose of prison is changing with a greater emphasis placed on reducing recidivism and enabling rehabilitation (Fox & Grimm, 2013) . It has been argued that reconstructive behavioral change is highly dependent upon one’s decision not to reoffend, and the support and motivation that are required to help that choice are key (Karthaus et al., 2019) . The rehabilitative framework of the criminal justice system in the United States must adopt new approaches in addressing the inability of inmates to reintegrate into the society upon their release (Ganapathy, 2018) . The criminal justice system is plagued with high recidivism rates, which is an indication that prisons do not adequately prepare prisoners for life after prison (Gideon & Sung, 2010) .
Delegate your assignment to our experts and they will do the rest.
Problem Statement
The empirical focus of this research is to support new rehabilitation approaches for prisons to become places of progress that champion for active citizenship and provide conditions that will enable inmates to turn their lives around (Balafoutas et al., 2020) . The current global prison population stands at 10.5 million, and although many countries have seen a decline in the number of crime rates in the past decade, the rates of reoffending inmates are on the rise. Two-thirds of all prisoners released in the United States are often rearrested within three years of their release (Balafoutas et al., 2020) . Recent developments on restorative justice constitute the use of cognitive-behavioral therapy in reducing recidivism in juvenile and adult offenders, and the use of digital technology such as virtual reality in the preparation of inmates for life after imprisonment both psychologically and professionally (Fox & Grimm, 2013) .
Research Aims and Objectives
This research seeks to investigate and evaluate the methods that will improve the rates of recidivism among released prisoners equipped with the capacity to make informed decisions and solve disputes lawfully and peacefully. Although we demand that prisoners must behave within the confines of the law, they must be provided with the necessary tools to do so (Balafoutas et al., 2020) .
In the Bible, prions were used as symbols of injustice and oppression. There is nowhere in the Bible that we find the authorization of prisons. Although prisons have been outlined in the Bible, they were used as holding places. Modern prisons have not been built based on God’s laws but the ideas of men, which makes them incapable of getting to the core of crime, which is human nature (Deuteronomy 3:12 New International Version) . The Bible calls for Christians to care for those in prisons and critique the overreliance of the modern society in prisons as a tool for social control (Karthaus et al., 2019) .
References
Balafoutas, L., García-Gallego, A., Georgantzis, N., Jaber-Lopez, T., & Mitrokostas, E. (2020). Rehabilitation and social behavior: Experiments in prison. Games and Economic Behavior , 119 , 148-171. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geb.2019.10.009
Duwe, G., Hallett, M., Hays, J., Jang, S., & Johnson, B. (2015). Bible College Participation and Prison Misconduct: A Preliminary Analysis. Journal of Offender Rehabilitation , 54 (5), 371-390. https://doi.org/10.1080/10509674.2015.1043481
Fox, C., & Grimm, R. (2013). The role of social innovation in criminal justice reform and the risk posed by proposed reforms in England and Wales. Criminology & Criminal Justice , 15 (1), 63-82. https://doi.org/10.1177/1748895813511832
Ganapathy, N. (2018). Rehabilitation, reintegration, and recidivism: a theoretical and methodological reflection. Asia Pacific Journal of Social Work and Development , 28 (3), 154-167. https://doi.org/10.1080/02185385.2018.1501416
Gideon, L., & Sung, H. (2010). Rethinking Corrections: Rehabilitation, Reentry, and Reintegration . SAGE.
Jang, S., Johnson, B., Hays, J., Hallett, M., & Duwe, G. (2019). Prisoners Helping Prisoners Change: A Study of Inmate Field Ministers Within Texas Prisons. International Journal of Offender Therapy and Comparative Criminology , 64 (5), 470-497. https://doi.org/10.1177/0306624x19872966
Karthaus, R., Block, L., & Hu, A. (2019). Redesigning prison: the architecture and ethics of rehabilitation. The Journal of Architecture , 24 (2), 193-222. https://doi.org/10.1080/13602365.2019.1578072
New International Version . (2011). BibleGateway.com .www.biblegateway.com/versions/New-International-Version-NIV-Bible/#booklist.
