How does Harry Define Eugenics and what is the Relationship to Gene Therapy?
According to Harry, eugenics gives the necessity to improve the breed of mankind through producing fine off-springs. As understood by most researchers and medical professionals, Harry describes gene therapy as being helpful in aiding a person in healing . Therefore, eugenics is adverse as it involves artificially enhanced methods of reducing a person’s suffering. Therefore, he argues that gene therapy is similar to eugenics despite it being ethically sound. Understanding the two concepts means sorting out the significant moral issues and relevant distinctions.
What does Harry Understand by a “Harmed Condition” and why is this Relevant for his Defense of Gene Therapy?
Delegate your assignment to our experts and they will do the rest.
In this case, Harry understands harmed condition as being a situation where a person is preconceived to have anomalies or problems with normal body functioning that would potentially hinder future positive health outcomes. For instance, a female having a few reproductive eggs is in a harmed condition if she is likely to pass on her problem to her offsprings . In this case, since gene therapy intends on correcting a situation that has readily available evidence-based procedures, it would be morally right to help an individual. In the broadest sense, gene therapy would, therefore, be justified if it prevents a disability state from being passed on to offsprings during procreation.
Harry’s Idea of Moral Continuum
In this regard, Harry’s moral continuum expresses the conflict of whether it is morally wrong to desire to have a fine child and hoping not to get a disabled child. A person who wishes to get a healthy baby but rejects possible methods of helping her achieve her wish would be viewed otherwise. However, as long as the medical procedures are morally acceptable and ethically right, the morality to the medical actions we take will continue to remain vague. For instance, seeking ways to cure disabilities would be regarded as viewing the condition as undesirable. Therefore, parents having disabled children would be perceived as not being happy or contented with the situation. Morality will, therefore, continue to be challenged.
Why does Harry believe it would be wrong for Parents to withhold from their Disabled Children Cures that Medical Science had made Available? Do you agree? Why?
According to Harry, disability is either a physical or mental condition that one wishes not to be in. As a harmed condition, a doctor would be regarded as being negligent if he or she does not reverse the condition when presented with solutions. In the same regard, it would be wrong for a parent to knowingly refuse to take supplements that would protect the baby when born. In both instances, he believes it to be immoral not to help prevent or cure a treatable condition. I, therefore, agree with Harry that it would not be right for parents to prevent their disabled children’s states from being corrected. After all, prolonging an undesirable condition for a child is like wishing ill for them.
How does Harry Respond to the Objection of Gene Therapy is only Morally Acceptable if it Attempts to Remove Dysfunction, but no when it is Designed to Enhance Normal Healthy Life? Do you agree with his Response, or do you agree with the Objection? Why?
Harry asserts that gene therapy should be accepted as it is morally right in treating dysfunctions and enhancing normal health. Given the example of supplement intake during pregnancy, enhancing human health through gene therapy is morally acceptable. In this regard, I agree with his opinions and thoughts on gene therapy. This is because health promotion is critical in enhancing the overall well-being of people.
Do you believe the Widespread Use of Gene Therapy and Genetic Enhancements Would Lead to a Dystopian Future when the Enhanced Would discriminate against the Unenhanced? How does Harris Comment on Such a Possibility?
However, the widespread use of gene therapy should be controlled in order not to conflict with normal situations. A perfect IVF baby might possibly be favored and preferred to a normal baby who has the possibilities of having certain health conditions. However, nothing and no one can be perfect. Almost similarly, Harry agrees to the widespread use of gene therapy as there is no moral authority that questions the practice. Using the fear of possible discrimination is an excuse to victimize the already burdened and categorized minorities.
