Epistemology is a segment of philosophy that centers its focus in studying the nature, methods, origin, limits, and validity of human knowledge. Through epistemology, we have been able to comprehend the most complex behaviors and character in the society ( Pauwels, 2015 ). There has been an eruption of many philosophers who in greater terms try to bring out the clear picture of epistemology from the ancient moments to the modern times. Like in our case study we bring out in a clear view the two different ideologies two philosophers hold against a certain topic in the society. The two philosophers seem to be at loggerhead in trying to explain and justify their doctrines, but to some point, they seem to agree on certain aspects ( Krämer, 2013 ). The illustrations below are a collective picture of how the two different principles of the two philosophers are analyzed and presented. They illustrate in detail the relationship between their ideas and standings on the subject matter.
Series 1 represents Hume whereas series 2 represent Descartes.
N/B: Category one stands for the primary objects, and they both hold the same ideology. Category two represent the five standard senses where the one that trusts in the regards stand at 4.5, and the one who does not trust in the five reasons stand at a figure close to zero . Category three represent the secondary object where Hume believes they are found both in mind and in objects themselves whereas Descartes considers secondary objects are only found in mind ( Cat, 2017 ) .
Delegate your assignment to our experts and they will do the rest.
The pie charts represent the different ideologies the two philosophers Hume and Descartes hold concerning the five ordinary senses ( Kuklick, 1984). The blue color signifies agreement whereas the maroon color signifies different thinking against the same vie.
References
Cat, J. (2017). Epistemology, Aesthetics and Pragmatics of Scientific and Other Images: Visualization, Representation and Reasoning. In Fuzzy Pictures as Philosophical Problem and Scientific Practice (pp. 47-67). Springer International Publishing.
Krämer, S. (2013). The Mind’s Eye’: Visualizing the Non-visual and the ‘Epistemology of the Line. From ontos verlag: Publications of the Austrian Ludwig Wittgenstein Society-New Series (Volumes 1-18) , 17 .
Pauwels, L. (2015). ‘Participatory’visual research revisited: A critical-constructive assessment of epistemological, methodological and social activist tenets. Ethnography , 16 (1), 95-117.
