Abstract
This is an executive summary of the journal paper by Sand ‐ Jecklin & Sherman about quantitative assessment of nurse and patient outcomes for implementing bedside nursing report. The summary presents the main purpose of the study, the study design, the research variables and research findings. This study emphasizes on the importance of effectively implementing the nursing bedside reports.
Sand ‐ Jecklin & Sherman Research Study Summary
Purpose of the Research
Sand ‐ Jecklin, K., & Sherman (2014) begin by clarifying that nursing bedside studies pay attention to two broad areas. The first area of concerning is implementing the nursing bedside report by either giving a detailed explanation regarding how the change could be effectively implemented by other organizations or give a description of the experiences in regards to implementation. The second area of emphasis is enhancing bedside reporting, usually via identifying and observing the common themes. Unfortunately, even though there is an evident high level of consistency in the proposed approaches for implementing bedside reports, there are still gaps in the earlier studies about documenting the quantitative nurse and patient outcomes. Sand ‐ Jecklin, K., & Sherman (2014) research study, therefore, identifies numerous advantages of bedside nursing shift report. This study, therefore, aimed to give meaning to the quantitative hospital outcomes/results of a change in nursing practice to a blended method of bedside report.
Delegate your assignment to our experts and they will do the rest.
Study Design
The research design adopted by Sand ‐ Jecklin, K., & Sherman (2014) for this experiment was Quasi-experimental pre-implementation and post-implementation design.
How was the population selected?
The researchers conducted the study on a hospital patient population. They specifically went for a convenient sample of patents who were hospitalized for not less than 48 hours and were scheduled to be discharged from the medical surgical units in several days during the month of baseline data collection.
Where the patients were not able to complete the surveys by themselves, the family members were asked to complete the surveys. Only one survey was given to the patient or family member.
How was the data collected?
The researchers first obtained approval from the board. They then collected baseline data associated to the nurse perceptions regarding the shift report process and the patient perceptions regarding nursing care.
The authors adopted the ‘ Patient Views on Nursing Care ’ patient survey tool from the Larrabee ‘ Patient Judgments of Nursing Care’ instrument. This survey tool had 17 questions that dealt with nurse behaviors including how to treat patients kindly and with respect, teaching patients to understand, etc. All the questions/items had a 5-point Linkert-scale, with the patient required to indicate a range of care from excellent care to poor care. All the responses were sealed in an envelope for confidentiality. The responses were collected and analyzed for the results.
The nurses’ perceptions regarding the shift report were collected through an online questionnaire. The ‘Nursing Assessment of Shift Report’ survey was based on literature review, emphasizing on the nurse-identified pitfalls and benefits of bedside report.
References
Sand ‐ Jecklin, K., & Sherman, J. (2014). A quantitative assessment of patient and nurse
outcomes of bedside nursing report implementation. Journal of Clinical Nursing , 23 (19-20), 2854-2863.
