Protection of private and confidential information is of paramount importance particularly in this age of computers where cases of digital crimes are on the rise. In an endeavor to combat this worrying spate of cybercrime, the United States has enacted laws that address these cases in specific domains. Conversely, the European Union, which regards privacy as a basic right developed umbrella laws that cover all industries and institutions in the region. The legal approach adopted by the US is effective because if stresses on the nature of digital crime in respective organizations and institutions. It is, therefore, important to remember that digital crimes vary in nature and occur differently within the organizations. Thus domain-centered laws are important in addressing the specific nature of the digital crime that afflicts a given body (Von Schomberg, 2013). Moreover, this can help in the development of relevant laws that are easier to implementing so as to combat the surge that is causing the huge loss of information. Additionally, the US’s model facilitates training of specialist who can be solely responsible for addressing the crimes in a given domain.
The approach deployed by the European Union suffers a major weakness manifested owing to a failure of the system to comprehensively address the scourge of cybercrime. Further, this approach is expensive to implement because it requires a great pool of specialists who should undergo proper training to equip them with the right skills to handle the various sophisticated hardware and software. According to the Indian Information Technology Act, the country approaches privacy security from a state-centric angle. In this case, the government works in coordination with the regional administrations to design laws that regulate cyber activities while striving to keep the crimes at bay (Attard, et al, 2015). Slightly similar to the American approach, the Indian model has been hugely successful in dealing with privacy issues; the country, however, still continues to experience challenges in this respect.
Delegate your assignment to our experts and they will do the rest.
References
Von Schomberg, R. (2013). A vision of responsible innovation .
Attard, J., Orlandi, F., Scerri, S., & Auer, S. (2015). A systematic review of open government data initiatives . Government Information Quarterly, 32(4), 399-418.
