The right to euthanasia has been an issue of concern among United States citizens for an extended period now. The act of having a healthcare professional assist to end the life of an individual has always caused several discussions because many people tend to view it as immoral ( Gandsman, 2018) . However, provision of this right is necessary as it enables sick individuals with terminal illnesses to end their suffering as most of them may wish. Americans need to have the right to end their lives because it involves their autonomy in using rights to determine what to do with their lives.
Americans have many rights that enable them to decide many things in the lives, and an example is a decision about who to marry or the number of children they need to have. The right to euthanasia requires consideration as a right among citizens of the country because they are the ones who need to exercise their autonomy in determining what to do with their lives ( Kouwenhoven et al., 2019 ). Like any other patient receiving nursing care, patients need to have a say on better ways to relieve their pain ( Kouwenhoven et al., 2019 ). Terminally ill patients usually experience severe pain, making them develop a need to receive assisted death or end to life. If healthcare fails to provide the right to euthanasia, such patients may consider suicide. Provision of the right to the use of euthanasia should allow people who do not support it to avoid it but not have control over others' decisions who may prefer to have it. This provision helps to address the morality argument towards the right.
Delegate your assignment to our experts and they will do the rest.
In general, the right is effective in autonomy and provision of liberties to terminally ill patients. Preventing healthcare providers from offering this wish to patients may seem like denying their rights towards deciding their fate. Some of the patients tend to view life as a burden that needs to come to an end. This view may contradict the perspective that continuity of life is of everyone's interest; however, it offers the autonomy such patients need to decide.
References
Gandsman, A. (2018). The paradox of choice and the illusion of autonomy: The construction of ethical subjects in right-to-die activism. Death Studies , 42 (5), 329-335. https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/07481187.2017.1396646
Kouwenhoven, P. S., Van Thiel, G. J., van der Heide, A., Rietjens, J. A., & van Delden, J. J. (2019). Developments in euthanasia practice in the Netherlands: Balancing professional responsibility and the patient's autonomy. European Journal of General Practice , 25 (1), 44-48. https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/13814788.2018.1517154
