In response to one of the multiple questions you have asked, I will begin by acknowledging the decisive role played by sound journalism to ensure that we are smart. On the other hand, lousy journalism and fabrication of opinions or facts without basis is a menace to the society. From one of the definitions I like, Herman and Chomsky are very clear on the functions and impacts of journalism. The two outline that; through journalism, the society should amuse, entertained, informed, and enriched with values which are an integral part of the moral fabric of the community. I maintain that the type of journalism highlighted by Herman and Chomsky is the proper type of journalism and if practiced within the confines of the definition, then the society should brow smarter.
Lousy journalism often unfolds and escalates whenever the source of information being disseminated is not known or credible. The inability to dispute lousy journalism indeed turns the recipients into dunderheads. It is therefore vital to stop and question the integrity of the news being conveyed less we end up dumber than we were in the first place.
Delegate your assignment to our experts and they will do the rest.
Shifting my thought on the sentiments of Herman and Chomsky, the two spell out the power advertisements have to dictate what should and should not be printed in a paper. In their manuscript, emphasis and in-depth explanation are provided on how advertising shapes media companies both positively and negatively. The positive aspect of an advertising-based system is based on the existence of the paper while the negative element is based on the marginalization of the paper. According to the two, advertising is a limitation to the existence of a neutral system in the free market where the buyer should be the ultimate decision maker. The bottom line of Herman and Chomsky’s observation is the ability of the advertiser’s choice to impact the survival or extinction of media companies. In my perspective, this type of journalism is not right and as such a hazard to the society since unhealthy censorship occurs when certain companies dictate the kind of stories to disseminate.
Unfortunately, in such cases, the society is restricted to the type of conversations to hold with each other when they are forced into subjugation by the advertising-based system. The public is limited to information that ignites discussions on the cornerstone of morality in the society bringing into question the fairgrounds of practice in journalism.
