Local and state elections have a magnificent effect on Georgia's people's lives and impact the state government. Elections related to local and state governments have direct decisions that affect the lives of Georgia's people. Also, the state government influences how the national government rules through the policies they legislate.
The local elections lead to the formation of a local government that has a direct responsibility to Georgia's people. Electing competent local and state governments will lead to the effective utilization of public resources, thus positively impacting local people's lives ( Nalau et al., 2015) . The local government is responsible for local schools' quality, public safety measures, ensuring the locals live in affordable houses, job training programs, and college development. Local and state governments can facilitate those mentioned above by developing policies that can influence the decisions related to the community's priorities and ways of running local community developmental programs ( ARRIGHI & Bauböck, 2017) . The state elections result in state representatives who can either create lasting change or push for harmful agendas that can benefit or hurt Georgia's people. Suppose the people elect leaders who are centered on the needs of the local people. In that case, it can lead to local power and capacity development, an essential consideration in achieving a progressive state.
Delegate your assignment to our experts and they will do the rest.
The state government also has an impact on how the national government is administered. The national government's landmark policies are shaped by state governments ( Hayes & Lawless, 2015) . Electing of state governments with the capability to influence the national government is vital. Notably, states that elect leaders to enact policies important for common people, such as minimum wage, marriage equality, and environmental innovation, shape how the national government operates ( Riverstone-Newell, 2017) . Nonetheless, electing state government and holding them accountable helps create the change that one desires to see in the national government.
References
Arrighi, J. T., & Bauböck, R. (2017). A multilevel puzzle: Migrants’ voting rights in national and local elections. European Journal of Political Research , 56 (3), 619-639. https://doi.org/10.1111/1475-6765.12176
Hayes, D., & Lawless, J. L. (2015). As local news goes, so goes citizen engagement: Media, knowledge, and participation in US House Elections. The Journal of Politics , 77 (2), 447-462. https://www.journals.uchicago.edu/doi/abs/10.1086/679749
Lavenia, M., Cohen-Vogel, L., & Lang, L. B. (2015). The Common Core State Standards initiative: An event history analysis of state adoption. American Journal of Education , 121 (2), 145-182. https://www.journals.uchicago.edu/doi/abs/10.1086/679389
Nalau, J., Preston, B. L., & Maloney, M. C. (2015). Is adaptation a local responsibility?. Environmental Science & Policy , 48 , 89-98. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envsci.2014.12.011
Riverstone-Newell, L. (2017). The rise of state preemption laws in response to local policy innovation. Publius: The Journal of Federalism , 47 (3), 403-425. https://doi.org/10.1093/publius/pjx037
