The most suitable strategy for reviewing and critiquing literature in my future practice as an advanced nurse with an emphasis in public health, stems from the mnemonic PICOT. The mentioned mnemonic stands for people, intervention, comparison, outcome and time (Bernhofer, 2015). Applying the four concepts will assist me in finding, reviewing and critiquing the literature in my quest to provide the best possible public health services to my patients.
Relevance to the targeted communities is the first component of the strategy. In public health, the concept of patient expands to involve a large group or community. Individual and group particulars may vary exponentially; hence, data that is relevant to one group, such as the affluent, maybe irreverent to another, such as the homeless (Brownson et al., 2017). Suitability to the specific patient or set of patients is thus an essential component of the strategy.
Delegate your assignment to our experts and they will do the rest.
The nature of intervention is also an important area to consider, especially when it involves its current state. Public health is a rapidly advancing science; hence, the importance of ensuring that proposed interventions are up to date. Comparison is also vital to ensure that the best possible intervention suitable to the patient or group. The review should thus include an evaluation of how the suggested response compares to other available options (Moore et al., 2015).
Another important consideration when evaluating literature in public health is the outcome, both on a short term and long-term basis. In the given context, the outcome combines both the impact of the process on the situation and patient outcomes (Brownson et al., 2017). For example, a procedure that would lead to the progress of herd immunity but is isolated from the department of public health may not yield much success.
Finally, the concept of time is critical to the review and critiquing of literature for application in public health. Time in the instant context relates to both relevance and duration. Time-based significance relates to whether the intervention proposed in the literature applies to the dispensation covered in the scope of the literature review (Bernhofer, 2015). Moreover, it is important to consider the duration of the intervention technique as stated in the literature.
References
Bernhofer, E. I. (2015). Reviewing the Literature: Essential First Step in Research, Quality Improvement, and Implementation of Evidence-Based Practice. Journal for nurses in professional development , 31 (4), 191-196.
Brownson, R. C., Baker, E. A., Deshpande, A. D., & Gillespie, K. N. (2017). Evidence-based public health . Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
Moore, G. F., Audrey, S., Barker, M., Bond, L., Bonell, C., Hardeman, W., ... & Baird, J. (2015). Process evaluation of complex interventions: Medical Research Council guidance. bmj , 350 , h1258.
