SUFFRAGE MOVEMENT IN THE EARLY TWENTIETH CENTURY

Introduction

Women in the 16th and 17th centuries had been regarded as very weak creatures in the society; however, the truth is that this allegation is entirely not correct. In fact, the women during this century were strong enough to go against all the discrimination and atrocities which women faced and they are the foundation of the current right which the women currently enjoy. As they struggle for women identity and their rights to vote in many countries in Europe especially Russia, USA and Britain. The massage of these women suffrage in these countries was one; however, they use different tactics to achieve their dream.

Annotated Bibliography

Mickenberg, Julia L. "Suffragettes and Soviets: American Feminists and the Specter of Revolutionary Russia." The Journal of American History 100, no. 4 (2014): 1021-1051.

What implications did the “Russian Banner” or what was called the Russian suffrage had on the Americans women movements? This article is based on the impact of the Russians Suffragettes on the Americans fight to quench their suffragette’s thirst. Mickenberg’s primary idea is that the Russians banner which was used to remind the Russian president his failure to grant women Suffrage was the cause of the women movements that granted them suffrage right in the USA. The paper is aimed at a woman to stand up and fight for their right. The Russian banner was stepping stone for the Americans woman. The bias has been minimized in this article by the use of reputable references. The author has also been involved in publications of other materials and hence makes this article credible. 

Bijon, Béatrice. "Forward, Sisters, Forward!,” 1 Community as family in the british and american suffrage movements béatricebijon and clairedelahaye." Exchanges and Correspondence: The Construction of Feminism (2010): 97.

What was the implication of the union of a British woman and American women on the international Suffrage?The author of the article is Bijon Beatrice. The main idea she sells in the article is that the women voting freedom and many other rights in the entire Europe was achieved because of the Unity that existed between the women. The book claimed that the coming together of the British and Americans women made them had the same goal and more power and hence won the battle. The article is also addressed to a woman. The book was published in the years 2010 and has covered most contemporary issues. Based on the level of education and experiences, the book is credible. The book has used different references and cited many works hence bias has been minimized. However, the author Gender and the topic addressed may be the source of bias.

Hunt, William Radler. "" Suffragettes of the Harem": The Evolution of Sympathy and the Afterlives of Sentimentality in American Feminist Orientalism, 1865-1920." PhD diss., 2016.

What factors affected the women literature and culture and what brought about the transformation? Hunt William authored this article. It addresses the issue of sympathy which was the main factors which made a woman suffer more domestically and in the world of Literature. However, due to the Suffragette spirit in British and Russia, some women in the USA got the courage and decided to fight against this issue like in England and Russia. The article is addressing the women, and the central message is "do what is right." The article was published in the years 2016 and it, therefore, covers contemporary issues which affect woman economically, culturally and domestically. Moreover, the author has used many other references and has cited different authors hence credible and biased have been minimized. 

Grant, Kevin. "British suffragettes and the Russian method of hunger strike." Comparative Studies in Society and History 53, no. 1 (2011): 113-143.

How different was the British and USA suffragette?Grant Kevin authored this article. His main idea is to identify some of the similarities and some difference between Suffragette in USA, Russia and British. The primary purpose which is dominant in this article is how the Russian method of dealing with protestant was unique since they used Hunger strike. The article was published in 2011. This is an implication that the current women issues are addressed in this paper. It has used secondary research reviews to justify this issue further and hence is more credible and bias minimized. The author has also used different sources as references consequently reduced bias. He also has been cited by other authors and this increase the credibility of this document.

Miller, Ian. "‘A Prostitution of the Profession’?: The Ethical Dilemma of Suffragette Force-Feeding, 1909–14." In A History of Force Feeding , pp. 35-66.Springer International Publishing, 2016.

What were the consequences of the suffragette in the USA?Miller Ian Claims that the women movements in British, USA and Russia did not end without causing problems. The article majors on the tactics which were mostly used in these countries to deal with these movements, the force full feeding. The main issue is that it was unethical since it went against the ethical principle of autonomy. The article, therefore, concludes that this was a form of torture which these women were exposed to. The article was published in the year 2016. It addresses women issues based on some of the challenges they faced during the time they fought for their rights. The article has minimized bias by citing other authors and using other reputable sources as references. 

Crossley, Nick, Gemma Edwards, Ellen Harries, and Rachel Stevenson. "Covert social movement networks and the secrecy-efficiency trade off The case of the UK suffragettes (1906–1914)." Social Networks 34, no. 4 (2012): 634-644.

How were the consequences of the women Suffrage in UK and USA?Crossley et al. is the author of the article. The article involves many court cases concerning the Suffragette in US and UK. One of the major ideas which are revealed in this paper is that there is an evident similarity on the consequences of the women Suffrage in both countries. First, their efforts were rewarded, though through a rough patch. The article was published in the year 2012. It has used many articles as references hence reduced bias. The article addresses the victims of the Suffrages in both countries and any other individual who wish to learn more about the movements.

De Haan, Francisca. "Continuing Cold War paradigms in the western historiography of transnational women's organisations: The case of the Women’s International Democratic Federation (WIDF)."Women's History Review 19, no. 4 (2010): 547-573.

Were the women movements being manipulated?De Haan who is the author of this article presents this issue as the hypothesis of her Research. The primary intention of the article, therefore, is to analyze “the Congress of American Women (CAW) and its international umbrella organization, the Women’s International Democratic Federation, were deeply politicized, i.e. ‘Communist' but not ‘feminist'" The article addresses women issues. It was published in the year 2010 hence has covered contemporary problems. It has used some credible sources as references and thus has reduced bias. It addresses the culture of unity among women. The author has a rich academic background, and this makes the article more credible.

Braun, Sebastian, and Michael Kvasnicka. "Men, women, and the ballot: Gender imbalances and suffrage extensions in the United States." Explorations in Economic History 50, no. 3 (2013): 405-426.

What were the weaknesses of the women suffrages movements in the USA, British and Russia?Brun and Michael jointly authored this article. The primary intention was to examine what caused the women suffrage movements in the USA and international countries to extend 1869 to the years 1919. They reveal that women disunity was their weakness since not many were willing to join the movements. The article was published in the years 2013. The authors have used different credible and reputable references to justify their claims, and this makes the article even more credible. This has also minimized bias in the article.

Bibliography

Bijon, Béatrice. "Forward, Sisters, Forward!,” 1 Community as family in the british and american suffrage movements béatricebijon and clairedelahaye." Exchanges and Correspondence: The Construction of Feminism (2010): 97.

Braun, Sebastian, and Michael Kvasnicka. "Men, women, and the ballot: Gender imbalances and suffrage extensions in the United States." Explorations in Economic History 50, no. 3 (2013): 405-426.

Crossley, Nick, Gemma Edwards, Ellen Harries, and Rachel Stevenson. "Covert social movement networks and the secrecy-efficiency trade off The case of the UK suffragettes (1906–1914)." Social Networks 34, no. 4 (2012): 634-644.

De Haan, Francisca. "Continuing Cold War paradigms in the western historiography of transnational women's organisations: The case of the Women’s International Democratic Federation (WIDF)." Women's History Review 19, no. 4 (2010): 547-573.

Grant, Kevin. "British suffragettes and the Russian method of hunger strike." Comparative Studies in Society and History 53, no. 1 (2011): 113-143.

Hunt, William Radler. "" Suffragettes of the Harem": The Evolution of Sympathy and the Afterlives of Sentimentality in American Feminist Orientalism, 1865-1920." PhD diss., 2016.

Mickenberg, Julia L. "Suffragettes and Soviets: American Feminists and the Specter of Revolutionary Russia." The Journal of American History 100, no. 4 (2014): 1021-1051.

Miller, Ian. "‘A Prostitution of the Profession’?: The Ethical Dilemma of Suffragette Force-Feeding, 1909–14." In A History of Force Feeding , pp. 35-66.Springer International Publishing, 2016.