The balance and imbalance of power is significant in describing modern day sovereignty. Its extreme nature is often associated with wars; however, this can be legitimized as a tool for determining who gets greater dominance over the other in different concepts. This paper is going to review how balance is based on the imbalance of power and discuss its modern day perspective and how the imbalance could be extreme but still acknowledged as legitimate.
The concept of the imbalance of power refers to the relation between social power and general sovereignty between parties. Social power is based on the assumption that a person or a group of people can change something that other people or group of people would do either forcibly or through negotiations. Blau further states that when one offers a favor or a helping, one should respond and show gratitude in an equal manner and return a service when need arises hence illustrating a similar perception of power imbalance.
Delegate your assignment to our experts and they will do the rest.
There are several modern-day examples to illustrate this concept and how its extreme nature can still be accepted and legitimized. In regard to wars, the likelihood of a war occurring is directly related to the modern global imbalance of power especially where there are conflicting interests of power in mutual balance of wants, goals, and desires between parties. This extreme nature of imbalance of power is also accepted legitimately as a tool of statecraft hence supporting the theory. Additionally, the modern-day concept acknowledges war as the balance of power which relies on expectations that the fighting states would eventually settle their differences.
Conclusion
In sum, the idea of the imbalance of power is directly related to social power and general sovereignty among states. Extreme imbalance of power can easily lead to wars but it is often legitimized as a tool for settling differences and drawing base lines for future dominance.
