The bondage of free will by Martin Luther was published in the year 1525. The Bondage was a response to free will, which had taken place in 1524 at the first attack on Luther by Erasmus, who was being worried by the ways of Martin Luther for a very long time. The main issue in the bondage is whether humans have the liberty to choose between good and evil after their fall. The debate took place between Luther and Erasmus as one of the oldest reforms on the issue of free will among humans. In the argument, Erasmus begins by posing the evidence that no single individual is more tangled to the labyrinth as compared to that of free will.
Despite the criticism that Erasmus had on the Roman Catholic Church, he had the belief that there is a need for reformations from insider and that Luther has gone too far. Erasmus was sure that all individuals had free will, and the predestination that was in existence was not per the teachings in the bible. He argued that the ability of God's forecasting of future events was the reason why the events took place, and repentance was based on the existence of free will.
Delegate your assignment to our experts and they will do the rest.
Luther's response to the argument was that sins incapacitate individuals from focusing on their salvation, and they are not in a better position to bring themselves to God. thus, he stipulated that there is no free will as any sense of will that humans have is overwhelmed by the sins they commit. Equally, Luther stipulated that humans who are not saved are distracted by Satan, who is the prince of the mortal world. That is because Satan never let go of what he considers to be his unless strong divine powers of God overpower him.