Through reading 4.9 and 4.10 readings, it is clear that the main ideas of the two readings are on the person of Christ. APOLLINARIUS OF LAODICEA argues that the person of Christ was not fully human. He argues that Jesus was not fully human for He would be trapped into human sin. In this regard, it could be assumed that Christ had a divine and heavenly divine mind. Based on this assertion, Christ cannot be a totally human person. On the other end, the reading 4.10 depicts Gregory of Nazianzus critic on appollinarianism. Gregory argues against the argument that Christ was not fully human. He argues that if Christ is said not to be fully human, it denies the possibility of redemption 1 . In this regard, if Christ did not have a human mind, humanity cannot be said to receive the hope of redemption.
The writers of two arguments agree on the fact that Jesus was God and had authority. They agree on the fact that Christ was predestined for humanity and had to come to save it from sin. They agree on the issue of the fallen world and the purpose of Christ coming to die for the sin of man. However, the two authors sharply disagree on the person of Jesus as whether Christ was fully human or one with a divine 2 . These two differing schools of thought relays the issues of belief where appollinarianism holds on the fact that Christ was not fully human but one with a divine mind. On the contrary, Gregory of Nazianzus argues that Christ cannot be said not to be fully human, for if this happens, there is no redemption and hope.
Delegate your assignment to our experts and they will do the rest.
I agree with the second thought pattern that Christ was fully human. The fact that Christ endured the cross and wanted the cup to be taken away reveals that his mind was not just divine but was also human. I find the second argument better for it paints Jesus as one who came in the form of man to bring redemption to the world.
References
McGrath, Alister E. Ed . The Christian Theology Reader. 4 th Ed. Wiley Blackwell: West Sussex, 2011. Pp. 227-236.
Moss, Yonathan. Incorruptible Bodies: Christology, Society, and Authority in Late Antiquity. California: Univ of California Press, 2016, pp. 56-77.
Runia, Klaas. The Present-Day Christological Debate: Issues in contemporary theology. London: Wipf and Stock Publishers, 2001, pp. 39-87.
1 Runia, Klaas. The Present-Day Christological Debate: Issues in contemporary theology. London: Wipf and Stock Publishers, 2001, pp. 39-87.
2 Runia, Klaas. The Present-Day Christological Debate: Issues in contemporary theology. London: Wipf and Stock Publishers, 2001, pp. 39-87.
