The project I plan to accomplish is on the historical review of the origin and the legacy of the 1964 Civil Rights Act. The Civil Rights Act was not able to bring immediate change and equality in the American workplaces. However, the Civil Rights Act brought hope in gender and racial diversity, when it is analyzed through the Women’s Rights Movement and African American Civil Rights Movement’s lens (Aiken et al., 2013). Civil Rights Act 1964 did not bring immediate changes that people were expecting in the American workplaces, but it helped to bring developments on issues related to pregnancy discrimination, affirmative action, and sexual harassment .
The development of the Civil Rights of 1964 marked an important point in American history. Aiken et al. (2013) assert that the passing of the Civil Rights Act in 1964 outlawed the far-reaching, systematic, and in other cases, legally sanctioned discrimination that existed for many years in American society. The Civil Rights Act was passed in 1964 due to the impacts of social movements, major historical events, and federal and state legislation.
Delegate your assignment to our experts and they will do the rest.
A proper understanding of the historical development of Civil Rights and its impacts on American history is necessary for gaining knowledge of its influence on American workforce equality. Danielle et al. (2020) assert that most rights movements evolved alongside each other, thus the need to focus on equality in various areas such as among the minority groups, equality between minority and majority groups. The passing of the Civil Rights Act 1964 was a defining moment for American history and thus the need to review its history focusing on Title VII that prohibited any discrimination in the workplace based on gender and sexual orientation (Budow, 2020). Title VII prohibits even the employees from discriminating against employees on their set conditions and terms.
References
Aiken, J. et al. (2013). The Origins and Legacy of the Civil Rights Act of 1964. Journal of Business and Psychology, 28, 383-399.
Bodow, S. (2020). U.S. Supreme Court Rules That Title VII Protects Sexual Orientation and Gender Identity. Journal of Employee Relations Law, 46(3), 20-25.
Danielle, M. et al. (2020). To Whose Benefit: What Bostock v. Clayton County Means for Benefits Practitioners. Benefits Law Journal, 33(4), 121-126.
