Segregation and discrimination against the blacks sparked so many demonstrations from those who believed in equal rights. Martin Luther King remains one of the strong pioneers of what formalized to civil rights movement (Kakutani, 2013). In his speech “I have a dream”, Martin unequivocally expresses his dream of a one-day America that will embrace inclusion, by foregoing racial discrimination.
The civil rights movement of 1960s positively impacted the nation. This is evident in what it achieved as far a its ideas are concerned. Considering that the African Americans did not have equal opportunities in political representation, the civil rights movement changed this notion (Ware, 2013). African Americans started holding public offices, that before had been preserved for the white Americans only. They started utilizing their positions in public offices by engaging in legislative roles. Most of the legislative changes they advocated for included; equality and right to vote. This was a landmark as far as inclusion in representation and political positions for minorities is concerned.
Delegate your assignment to our experts and they will do the rest.
Civil Rights Acts is another significant aspect that effectively worked towards the rescue of African American. The act was significant due to its address on inclusion and diversity. Following the impact of the civil rights movement in early 1960s, the civil rights acts of 1964 supplemented the previous achievement. Although civil rights acts addressed inclusion, its ideas were directed towards employment opportunities. It banned segregation and discrimination based on race, country of origin, religion and gender. Equal access to public places and employment opportunities were offered without discrimination. From the passage of civil rights acts, the minority started accessing public places while at the same time getting equal employment opportunities. The act positively impacted on the minority across the continent.
Considering the ideas that the civil rights activists had during the 1960s, the tactics and strategies would effectively apply in todays racial and ethnic conflicts. This is because their tactics and strategies comprised of unity and demonstrations based on ideologies. Today’s cases of racial discrimination and ethnic conflicts would be effectively addressed. This is in relation to what the civil rights activists achieved in their times compared to what we have now. They were faced with many struggles and conflicts, issues that they championed against, and many of their grievances were addressed.
The ideas of 1960s still have much relevance today. This is in relation to what has been experienced in the recent past. Despite having achieved so much in terms of campaigns against racial discrimination, cases of killings rooting from racial abuse are evident. Several lives have been lost as a result of racial discrimination, an implication that the ideas that were championed for in 1960s are still relevant today.
Civil rights movements stand a big chance to impact diversity in America today, as a result of the continuous race discrimination. Their role would be effective if they addressed the cases of racial discrimination, by discouraging segregation and support diversity. Considering that the current America have various channels that can be utilized to address diversity, civil rights movements would be impactful by positively using the available resources to address the issues of diversity.
Summarily, civil rights movements have positively impacted on the state of minority in America. From 1960s to date, many privileges have been granted as a result of the ideas carried by the movements. These can be attributed to the important roles played by the civil rights activists from 1960s to date.
References
Kakutani, M. (2013, Aug. 27). The lasting power of Dr. King’s dream speech. The New York Times . Retrieved from https://www.nytimes.com/2013/08/28/us/the-lasting-power-of-dr-kings-dream-speech.html .
Ware, L. (2013). Civil rights and the 1960s: a decade of unparalleled progress. Maryland Law Review, 72 (4), 1087-1095.
