Most territories in the local and national governments anticipate the overall development and expansion of their services in the quest to meet the needs of the residents. Local governments in collaboration with the federal government come up with organized strategies to meet their short and long-term territorial goals and objectives. The plans are based on the problems underlying the territory in question (Avery et al., 2016). The solutions are based on the untapped and underutilized opportunities in the areas in question. Comprehensive planning entails the responsible incorporation of the available resources to create a better future. The betterment is defined by the economic viability and creation of a prosperous environment for both the current and future generations in the territory (Hamlin et al., 2017). A comprehensive plan acts as a driving force and guideline to meet a region’s set development goals and objectives. One of the significant resources used during the process island. Since all physical development initiatives depend on the availability of land, there is a need to properly plan and establish the best way that the available land can be utilized to arrive at an economic, healthy, prosperous, and convenient environment for the residents of a region. Rather than misusing and carelessly allocating projects on the land resource, the comprehensive plan should guide the developers on places to establish their development plans as well as the viability of the strategies in question (Baugher et al., 2017). The allocation should take into consideration the current and future requirements of the residents. Because of this, the study focuses on the most comprehensive plan of Leesville, Louisiana, the factors affecting comprehensive plan developments, and the biblical view of the development process in Leesville, Louisiana. Leesville measures 14.26km 2 and has a population of 6077 residents. Based on the amount of unutilized land and the topography of the town, there is a need to develop parks and restaurants to enhance the economic development of the region as a whole (McKinney, 2019). Also, the infrastructure section should be taken into consideration to ensure that the physically challenged pedestrians, cyclists, motorists and drivers are organized to enhance the proper running of operations in the region (Bernard et al., 2016). Markedly, to develop the most comprehensive, efficient and viable plan, it is crucial to include the participation of the public as a whole. The key individuals that should take part in the development plans should consist of both the adults and the youths to enhance their overall representation in the whole process. For instance, the individuals in charge of the departments responsible for the official land use should be consulted about the viability of the plan in meeting the set goals and objectives (Lyles et al., 2016). These parties are aware of the topography and structure of the land in question and can offer expert views on projects that can do well in different areas. Additionally, leaders representing different parts and demographics should be included in the whole exercise. These leaders present the interests of the parties that they represent; hence, even though not all residents participate in the process, their views are represented and acted upon as per their desires. Moreover, individuals viewed as opinion leaders and influencers should take part in the exercise to positively influence and contribute to the overall insights of the residents in the areas in question (Randolph, 2018). Finally, all the other individuals who are not affiliated with specific political parties should be given the opportunity to voice their personal views with regard to the development and implementation of the strategies in the implementation plan. Their opinions are pooled together and sorted out to develop the most viable strategies that are supported by the majority of the population (Nost, 2019). Ultimately, the comprehensive plan embraces a wide range of views from both individuals and groups in the territory in question. Various factors affect the process of comprehensive plan development. For instance, the topography and general features of the place in question determine the suggestion of the activities to be emphasized in the comprehensive plan. For instance, Leesville is characterized by terraces and rivers that create a scenic environment for tourist attractions. Thus, this may be taken into consideration when coming up with the plan (Killebrew & Khalil, 2018). Also, the presence of these rivers foretells possible floods in the areas and thus, this should be included in the development plan. Dams and water reservoirs should be considered during the comprehensive planning process to prevent flooding and to increase the water supply even during the dry seasons (Paille et al., 2016). Furthermore, the topographies affect the types of soil in the areas in question. For instance, in cases of heavy rains, the top productive soils in Leesville are bound to be washed away and hence soil conservation should be given priority to enhance further the beautiful view created by the plants in the area (Hemmerling, Barra & Bond, 2020). Thus, these factors play a significant role in the planning process.
From the biblical point of view, land should be cared for and maintained appropriately. During the story of creation, God instructed man to till and take care of the land and all the living things in it. The comprehensive development plan echoes the same sentiments as it emphasizes making the land and other resources better for future generations. Accordingly, human beings should do their best to meet the most viable and appropriate state of natural resources. No doubt, the development of natural resources is a crucial aspect across the territories. Land is the primary resource where growth occurs and thus, it should be utilized to realize the ultimate goals and objectives. Both scientific and biblical views are directed toward the improvement of natural resources for the benefit of human beings. Thus, comprehensive development plans should be given the seriousness that they deserve to realize their present and future advantages.
Delegate your assignment to our experts and they will do the rest.
References
Avery, E. J., Graham, M., & Park, S. (2016). Planning makes (closer to) perfect: exploring the United States’ local government officials’ evaluations of crisis management. Journal of contingencies and Crisis Management, 24 (2), 73-81.
Baugher, S., Appler, D. R., & Moss, W. (2017). Introduction: Thinking Globally and Acting Locally—Exploring the Relationships Between Community, Archaeological Heritage, and Local Government. In Urban Archaeology, Municipal Government and Local Planning (pp. 1-13). Springer, Cham.
Bernard, L., Marti, M., Kuehl, R., & Shorten, B. (2016). System Preservation Guide: A Planning Process for Local Government Management of Transportation Networks (No. MN/RC 2016-34A).
Hamlin, R. E., Van Ravensway, J., Mastej, M., & Hamlin, A. (2019). Strategic Planning in US Municipalities. In Strategic Planning in Local Communities (pp. 209-239). Palgrave Macmillan, Cham.
Hemmerling, S. A., Barra, M., & Bond, R. H. (2020). Adapting to a smaller coast: restoration, protection, and social justice in coastal Louisiana. In Louisiana's Response to Extreme Weather (pp. 113-144). Springer, Cham. extreme Weather (pp. 113-144). Springer, Cham.
Killebrew, C. J., & Khalil, S. M. (2018). An overview of the history of coastal restoration plans and programs in Louisiana. Shore & Beach, 86 (1), 28-37.
Lyles, W., Berke, P., & Smith, G. (2016). Local plan implementation: Assessing conformance and influence of local plans in the United States. Environment and Planning B: Planning and Design, 43 (2), 381-400.
McKinney, K. J. (2019). Getting Out of the Mud. Louisiana History: The Journal of the Louisiana Historical Association, 60 (3), 289-332.
Nost, E. (2019). Climate services for whom? The political economics of contextualizing climate data in Louisiana’s coastal Master Plan. Climatic Change, 157 (1), 27-42.
Paille, M., Reams, M., Argote, J., Lam, N. S. N., & Kirby, R. (2016). Influences on adaptive planning to reduce flood risks among parishes in South Louisiana. Water, 8 (2), 57. Killebrew,
Randolph, N. (2018). License to extract: How Louisiana’s Master Plan for a Sustainable Coast is sinking it. Lateral: Journal of the Cultural Studies Association, 7 (2).
