Rorty’s argument of our moral life is persuasive to me. According to Rorty, any belief is as good as the other, and it is not easy to figure out which view is better or worse. Lack of ‘algorithms’ to describe such things, as Rorty argues is similar to Rousseau and Kate who believe that moral actions are irrational (Charles,2018). Hobbes differed from Rorty in his argument that we tend to dislike something eventually calling it evil, but this notion is based on our beliefs about the consequences of the thing for us. Rorty provides a better account of moral life based on his arguments describes our moral life to have embedded in contexts, cultures and our ways of life.
We are supposed to understand Kant’s conception of morality by focusing on the right goals while making light of the significance of the advantages created by these activities. This claim by Kart seems to be legitimate as it focuses on logic and rational structure of our moral actions apart from consideration of happiness or natural order of things. Kant is right that all actions are rooted in concerns of one's lack of moral worth. Aristotle would argue that morality as an activity of the rational soul by virtue which is equivalent to excellence. Hobbes deductive method of reasoning would proclaim that morality was subject to diverse experience and was therefore capable of producing speculative assumptions. Mill understood that actions are right in proportion as they tend to promote happiness, which differed from Aristotle’s point of view which denoted that happiness depended more on ourselves more than anybody else (Marchetti,2018) .
Delegate your assignment to our experts and they will do the rest.
Hobbes argument of moral actions and behaviours is the most persuasive philosophical argument at this point because of his description of good and evil. Most individuals tend to call something we dislike as evil based on our beliefs based on the consequences of the thing for us.
References
Charles, D. (2018). Aristotle and modern realism. In Aristotle and Moral Realism (pp. 135-199). Routledge.
Marchetti, S. (2018). Two Varieties of Moral Exemplarism. Etica & Politica/Ethics & Politics .
