The 9/11 incident is a notable event that shaped the direction taken by non-state actors as far as the global war on terrorism is concerned. Self-sponsored terrorism has become a serious international threat. First, the groups have been used to challenge the monopoly of states in exercising the legitimacy of coercive power. They include politically motivated organizations that seek to destabilize states and their governments ( Primoratz, 2004) . For instance, after the inception of the Soviet Union, there have been numerous conflicts the are politically motivated by non-state actors in central Asia. Armenia and Azerbaijan conflicts are examples of terrorist non-state actions that have aimed at destabilizing the Soviet unity.
Non-state actors have discouraged foreign direct investments that could promote economic growth in countries. Political stability is a consideration that affects foreign direct investment. Countries such as Iran have had poor economic states due to the presence of many non-state terrorist groups. Mexico has terrorist groups such as the Animal Liberation Front and Earth Liberation Front ( Primoratz, 2004) . The terrorist finance their activities from through criminal activities such as drug trafficking human trafficking and robbery. The terrorist activities are a threat to the social, political, and economic well-being of the regions.
Delegate your assignment to our experts and they will do the rest.
The political developments in international relations after the 9/11 incident justify the political origins of terrorism. After the incident, there has been a crafty relationship between the US and Muslim countries. That has indicated that terrorism can be politically mitigated. Facilitators of terrorist groups such as ISIS, al-Qaida, and Hizballah have been threats to the US ( Primoratz, 2004) . Due to terrorism, the US government has sanctioned several countries because of their direct and indirect involvement in terrorist activities. Both state-sponsored and non-state sponsored terrorism activities can be politically motivated. For example, Iran’s Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps has been severally accused of sponsoring terrorist groups to enable them pursue their political objectives.
Reference
Primoratz, I. (2004). State terrorism and counter-terrorism. In Terrorism (pp. 113-127). Palgrave Macmillan, London.
