Advancement in technology has created a need to increase sophistication automation into the flight decks of modern airplanes. Sophisticated automation was introduced into the flight decks of modern airplanes to reduce the flight crew's workload, increase the economy of fuel, and add additional capability (Dorneich et al., 2016). Steam gauge models will, however, continue flying for a while. Improvement in the pilot interface continues to be an area of focus in research since the Second World War. The research is expected to continue even in the 21 st century as more aviation industry advancement emerges to ensue "fail-safe". Safe-mode is the reversion of the aircraft to safety in case of breakdown or malfunctioning.
Pros
Flight Deck Human-Machine Interface presents several advantages to modern aircraft. One of the benefits is that standards can be made to enhance credentials. Flight Deck human-machine interface is advantageous since it provides convenient flight and assistance operations to both the pilot and flight crew. The principle of using humans in command and involving them in monitoring the automated system provides an opportunity for the proper and efficient flight operation (Grote et al., 2014). Another advantage is that avionics band control increases functional capability without negatively affecting the weight of aircraft. Most appe aring technologies are linked with exhibitions and cockpit controls (Grote et al., 2014) . Another advantage of Flight Deck Human-Machine Interface is designing simple elements, especially in maintaining experiences related to flying, casualties, and other calamities.
Delegate your assignment to our experts and they will do the rest.
Cons
Flight-Deck Human-Machine's major challenge is that advances in avionic have created a high demand for coordination and standardization ( Lorenz, 2004 ). Another challenge is inadequate testing and validation, which ensures every system meet all requirement. Sometimes, there is an overrun of massive cost and schedule form issues of software development and validation. Flight Deck human-machine interface is created to offer assistance to humans, and it is not expected to hinder the smooth operation of the flight. Sufficient measures need to be put in place to ensure reliability on the interface machine to enhance operation (Dorneich et al., 2016).However, there rise risks on flight operation interface, which hinders effective performance.
References
Dorneich, M. C., Rogers, W., Whitlow, S. D., & DeMers, R. (2016). Human performance risks and benefits of adaptive systems on the flight deck. The International Journal of Aviation Psychology , 26 (1-2), 15-35.
Grote, G., Weyer, J., & Stanton, N. A. (2014). Beyond human-centered automation–concepts for human–machine interaction in multi-layered networks.
Lorenz, B. (2004). Human Centred Automation: Research and Design Issues. Aviation Psychology: Practice and Research , 3-26.
