The debate by Craig and Harrison focuses on creating an understanding of the ways in which people in society creates knowledge of what is good. The two philosophers differ significantly with Harrison arguing against the existence of God while Craig recognizes the role that God plays an essential role in helping people to differentiate between what is immoral and moral values. From the beginning, Harrison bases the argument on the role of scientific knowledge in assisting people to differentiate what is bad and good. In this case, Harrison argues that as long as both good and bad people experience the same level of happiness, then there is no need seeking the inclusion of God in understanding morally acceptable behavior. Craig rebukes this argument pointing out that God is the creator of the universe and what is good relies on his teachings.
Harris argues that the creation of what is good requires the establishment of scientific research ignoring the importance of religion in differentiating between immoral and moral behavior. An individual cannot understand what is good relying on scientific research because this kind of knowledge seeks to satisfy the needs of that particular individual. God is the creator of the universe and everything that exists on earth, religion should, therefore, be an essential aspect for understanding moral values. Though scientific research creates a chance for people experience some activities such as happiness, achieving dreams, satisfying feelings, and achieving happiness, it has not been in a position to employ a successful implementation of information needed in explaining the origin of the earth and man. As a result, scientific knowledge does not recognize the existence of religion and it seeks to solve problems facing human beings. Scientists tend to solve such problems without considering the difference between good and bad thus making it difficult for an individual to exercise moral values by relying on such knowledge. Religion only teaches moral values thus making it a necessity I teaching what is good.
Delegate your assignment to our experts and they will do the rest.
Understanding what is good depends on the opinion of the individual thus increasing the ability of a human to make decisions that affect their lives. Objective moral values depend on the opinion of the individual. The word of God plays an essential role in shaping the attitudes and feelings of people thus determining what is good and bad. Moral attitudes depend on the environment in which the person is brought up. Scientific research creates objective moral values that depend on the kind of knowledge that people usually create. However, God's teaching becomes an approach creates subjective values which guide people depending on deciding what is good and bad. Many moral religions such as Christianity and Islamic has a sure way of educating moral values that guide people in understanding what is good and bad. For instance, murder is unacceptable in many religions and it minimizes the chances for minimizing immoral issues related to death. However, in the absence of God's teaching, people may end up developing killing colleagues for selfishness.
Morality and religion may not be significantly synonym terms in society. Though the two terms are different, it is undeniable that these terms depend on each other to define what is wrong and good in society. For example, religion has laws that govern the operations of people who need to be termed as religiously holly. Though there exist laws that govern the functions of people in a particular position. Though this might be the case, the rules in every organization or any authoritative position usually have connections to religious teachings. For example, honest and trustworthy are essential characteristics that employees usually consider when hiring an individual to occupy a particular position. Application of these qualities requires the intervention of God indicating the necessity of developing religious teaching to succeed in the society.
