Flat world leadership has been used for the description of leadership in the management of business organizations. It entails a system of leadership with a limitation of hierarchies or no hierarchies at all. The system has been applied in different organizations including government institutions. This discussion entails the implications of the flat world leadership on the military and civilian leadership and administration. In addition, there is a comprehensive analysis based on the personal view of the operations of NATO.
The Implication of Flat World to Civilian and Military Leadership
In civilian leadership, the flat world has a number of implications on the governance of daily activities which impacts on the security of an individual. With flat world leadership, people feel unprotected as there are no mechanisms put in place to see into it that the trusted leadership from within is existing. In matters of security, civilians need some assurance based on the boundaries protection. Within the jurisdiction of a given state, there is the aspect where people feel protected within their own group or nations. The flat world can be taken to mean the idea of globalization in which people can do things across different boundaries without giving a second thought of their effects. Flat world ideologies have impacted the education system as people are capable of exchanging educational materials, ideas, information, and technology between different countries across the world. The leaders who have taken the brain dominance and have worked towards the urge to achieve leadership skills and position have demonstrated a high and exemplary output in terms of display of leadership prowess ( Kareem, 2016).
Delegate your assignment to our experts and they will do the rest.
With the aspect of a flat world, there are implications brought on the leadership in that there is no independence of a given state. Taking a case of management, for instance, there are countries which depend on others for their management support. The issue of a flat world is important for creating opportunities for employment as people are strengthened to have an array of technical knowledge in varied fields regardless of their country of origin ( Friedman, 2017). Education has undergone a lot of structural transformation based on the current situation and the happenings of the world in regard to the universal and global features. This has made the educational reformers and other shapers to be active and innovative enough to ensure they compete favorably with other parts of the world. It should be put into account that there are no fixed or perfect solutions when it comes to addressing the issue of challenges affecting educational set up (Waite, 2016). It thus means that there is a need for a follow-up, not just designing a framework and seating back watching things unfold by themselves.
The idea of the flat world has enabled the spread of programs such as leadership knowledge in which people can get leadership skills and services from the governments of various countries and states. Again in terms of leadership, there is an impact created as can be seen for various activities going on across the globe. Taking, for example, the case in which organizations are run from a central place by one manager who takes control of the entire system. Another important aspect of the flat world for leadership is that it creates connections as different people can communicate instantly with each other regardless of distance and time. Further, the connection created by the flat world has enabled the interchanging of the staff by leaders from one company to another. Most organizations are not in good positions to address how leadership might address some of the organizational gaps brought by cultural diversity, race, and ethnicity. Therefore, there is a proposal for a framework to assist in the creation of racial and other forms of equity in the operations of organizations (Ishimaru, & Galloway, 2014).
In military leadership, the flat world has created an array of implications such as conflict in operations and leadership. There is a possibility for divided loyalty and allegiance by an individual army commandant. The leaders in the military in pursuit of the flat world kind of leadership find it challenging to prioritize the competing needs. Such priorities include individual needs, military priorities, and the nation’s needs. This is brought about by the fact that the leader has no absolute control of a given soldier as there are no designed hierarchies. The flat world has played an important role in combating different insurgencies affecting the whole world like terrorism. It should be remembered that during the time of conflict like the September 11 terror attack on the US in 2001, different nations engaged in an initiative in which they jointly went to Iraq under the umbrella of the European Union and NATO forces. The multinational operations come with a shared burden ranging from the responsibility of each member state, the contradictions in the use of force as well as designing common objectives for a given operation. It also involved sharing financial obligations and designing a common framework for strategic operations (Cimbala, & Forster, 2016).
Contributions of NATO to Humanitarian Aid and Assist Civilian and Military Missions
NATO has been involved in many humanitarian aid missions like for the case of Pakistan in the year 2010 in which they delivered food and other items to the flood victims in the country. The humanitarian aid by the organization is informed by a request from a given member state in connection with the coordination of different stakeholders such as other NATO powers. Taking the case of Libya, there were conventions and evaluations to determine both the cost and benefits of the intervention as the mission was meant to prevent a civil bloodbath in Benghazi ( Kuperman, 2013).
Humanitarian interventions in war-torn areas are similar to the assistance needed after natural disasters such as floods and other natural calamities. Nonetheless, there are a lot of challenges faced when providing humanitarian relief in armed conflicts. In a war environment, for example, the agency mandated with the roles of emergency may find it impossible to maintain impartiality and political neutrality. In addition, it becomes difficult for the mission soldiers to keep communication with the perceived belligerent aggressors. Inasmuch as the activities of civic aid are guided by impartiality and equality, there are eventualities arising such as the people who are in urgent need of the aid as compared to the rest. These are some of the challenges faced by NATO in their military and human missions (Weiss, 2018). In my opinion, it can be prudent for NATO soldiers to eliminate any possible threat which might be designed to the innocent civilians. However, before the elimination of the threat which means combating the terrorists it is better if all the avenues are exploited especially the diplomatic interventions. There are needs to involve the intelligence gathering and inclusion of the mission objectives in undergoing the operations.
References
Cimbala, S. J., & Forster, P. K. (2016). Multinational military intervention: NATO policy, strategy and burden sharing . Routledge.
Friedman, T. L. (2017). The world is flat: A brief history of the twenty-first century (Vol. 19). Farrar, Straus and Giroux.
Ishimaru, A. M., & Galloway, M. K. (2014). Beyond individual effectiveness: Conceptualizing organizational leadership for equity. Leadership and Policy in Schools , 13 (1), 93-146.
Kareem, J. (2016). The influence of leadership in building a learning organization. IUP Journal of Organizational Behavior, 15(1), 7-18.
Kuperman, A. J. (2013). A model humanitarian intervention? Reassessing NATO's Libya campaign. International Security , 38 (1), 105-136.
Waite, D. (2016). The where and what of education today: a leadership perspective.
Weiss, T. G. (2018). Humanitarian challenges and intervention . Routledge.
