Conspiracy theories are widespread across the world and involve the spread of information and beliefs. However, these theories have specific traits which present several challenges which need to be resolved. Some of the theories are false, harmful, and even unjustified. This is because such theories are not spread by people who are irrational or of unsound mind but are as a result of a limited sources of information. People who accept such theories do so at a standpoint of limited information that is available to the society. Individuals in society lack information in the absence of civil freedoms which make them accept such theories as true. However, there exists dilemmas to governmental response to such harmful and false theories (Sunstein & Vermeule, 2009). These theories are very difficult to dispute or challenge because of their quality. However, the presentation of adequate information exposes such theories as false.
In the case of different dilemmas in society, it is important for an individual to choose between the good of the overall community or professional work ethics. These are areas which cannot be regulated by laws but by core ethical principles of integrity, honesty, and fairness. However, when a dilemma emerges as a result of two options which have right outcomes a decision must be made putting one right value against another. This is especially true in all aspects of life including personal, professional, international, educational, and religious among others. However, the world around us is full of right versus wrong decisions. Nonetheless, wring and wrong are totally different from right versus right choices. The right versus right choices need to be resolved by individual values which are ethical in nature. In this case, one needs to pretend that one right choice is wrong in order to adapt the other choice. On the other hand, right and wrong choices are different in such circumstances. This is because they always have a suspicious element around them. If right versus right choices are considered as ethical dilemmas, right versus wrong dilemmas should be considered as moral temptations. When rational individuals encounter, it cannot be said that they are experiencing moral temptations for the right versus wrong choices. When one is faced with tough choices it does not mean that they are facing moral temptations. They do not simply consider one choice as being right or true and the other as being false or wicked. Tough choices are not found in the right versus wrong choices but on the right versus right choices (Kidder, 2005). They are real dilemmas because all the choices are anchored on core values which are basic. The right versus right choices can be categorized as different models or paradigms such as truth against loyalty, the community against an individual, short-term against long-term, and justice against mercy.
Delegate your assignment to our experts and they will do the rest.
In the case of conspiracy theory, an individual is compelled to accept it as fact when he or she does not have enough information to make the right decision. This is a situation that captures the right versus wrong choice option where an individual requires accurate information to know if the theory is based on lies or facts. It becomes a dilemma because the community lacks information to ascertain whether the theory is indeed a fact. This then requires an individual to use his or her core belief to make the right ethical choice in relation to the said dilemma. He or she will have to employ the right ethical principles of honesty, integrity and fairness to come to the right conclusion. However, more information about the issue should be at his or her disposal to make the right decision. In short, any conspiracy theory should be judged according to the amount of information at the disposal of the perceiver. Limited information means that the perceiver is not in a position to know whether the theory is right or wrong. This creates a situation where the perceiver is unable to make the right choice. In a nut shell, the right versus right option calls for an individual to choose one option which appeals to his core beliefs. On the other hand, the right versus wrong option is obvious because a wrong cannot replace a right. The overarching argument here is that for one to make the right decision in any dilemma is to first have adequate information concerning the issue at hand.
References
Kidder, R. (2005). How Good People make Tough Choices: Resolving the Dilemmas of Ethical living. Institute of Global Ethics. Retrieved from: https://mail.google.com/mail/u/0/#inbox/FMfcgxwDrRZSfCSMbwCxrlZGptrMntMP?projector=1&messagePartId=0.1
Sunstein, C. & Vermeule, A. (2009). Symposium on Conspiracy Theories Conspiracy Theories: Causes and Cures. The Journal of Political Philosophy: Volume 17, Number 2, pp. 202–227
