Brief Description of the Agencies
Alaska Department of Public Safety
The Alaska Department of Public Safety is an agency that is charged with the responsibility of enforcing laws, requirements, and regulations that focus on protecting life, wildlife resources, and property within the state of Alaska. This particular public safety agency is also involved in performing rescue and search operations as well as court services, where it maintains records of criminal justice ( Wood & Trostle, 2017). In this regard, the Alaska Department of Public Safety plays a critical role in the enforcement of laws that are related to criminal to fire, traffic, wildlife, and criminal statutes.
Arizona Department of Public Safety
The Arizona Department of Public Safety is a law enforcement agency that operates at the state government level with the primary role and responsibility of patrol and enforcement of state laws that are expected to guide and regulate operations on highways. The Arizona Department of Public Safety has its headquarters in Phoenix. Since the inception of this particular public agency, it has managed to acquire several additional roles and responsibilities that have contributed to its evolution as a multi-faceted and renowned organization ( Azdps.gov , 2020).
Delegate your assignment to our experts and they will do the rest.
Similarities between the Agencies
Both the Alaska Department of Public Safety and Arizona Department of Public Safety are similar in the sense that the behaviors of their employees are significantly influenced and by their ethical and cultural environments. In this regard, both agencies have managed to put in place a set of ethical requirements and guidelines that identify and define the ethical responsibilities that are supposed to be observed by their employees (Wood & Trostle, 2017).
In the operations of both public safety agencies, the ethical and cultural environment inspires the employees to adopt attitudes, norms, and principles that are aligned to the agencies' goals and objectives. For example, the motivation behind the attitudes, norms, and principles demonstrated by employees for both agencies involves enforcement of laws and regulations that ensure the safety of humans, wildlife, and property, which is a primary element in their goals and objectives ( Azdps.gov , 2020).
Differences between the Agencies
The ethical and cultural environment within the Alaska Department of Public Safety influences its management system to support the establishment and maintenance of structures that focus on offering protection of life, wildlife resources, and property. On the contrary, the system of management embraced by the Arizona Department of Public Safety operates within an ethical and cultural environment that primarily focuses on patrol and enforcement of state laws and regulations on highways ( Azdps.gov , 2020).
In this way, the behavior of the employees at the Arizona Department of Public Safety agency is ethically shaped in a way that inspires them to place more emphasis on the enhancement and promotion of high quality of public safety through intelligence gathering and cooperative enforcement. In contrast, the behaviors of the employees of the Alaska Department of Public Safety are ethically shaped to focus on enforcement of laws affecting criminal statutes, fire, and traffic, and wildlife. For example, the Alaska Department of Public Safety organizes regular programs and sessions to train its employees and create awareness about criminal activities throughout the state of Arizona ( Wood & Trostle, 2017) .
Strengths and Weaknesses of the Agencies
Among the strengths of the Alaska Department of Public Safety is the sustainability of the Village Public Safety Officer (VPSO) Program, which ensures that members of the public in rural communities within the state of Alaska are not vulnerable to losses occasioned by fires and drowning among other calamities. However, the weaknesses of this particular agency include its inability to have a more spread out coverage of its services to virtually all members of the public within the state of Alaska ( Wood & Trostle, 2017) . The major strength of the Arizona Department of Public Safety is its enhanced capacity in the maintenance and development of close collaboration and partnership with other federal, state, country, and local safety agencies. On the other hand, its weaknesses include its narrow application of safety operations that fails to include broad criminal statutes ( Azdps.gov , 2020).
References
Azdps.gov. (2020). Arizona Department of Public Safety . Retrieved 24 February 2020, from
https://www.azdps.gov/crime_lab/statistics/23280.
Wood, D., & Trostle, L. (2017). The non-enforcement role of police in western Alaska and
the eastern Canadian Arctic: An analysis of police tasks in remote arctic communities.
Journal Of Criminal Justice , 25 (5), 367-379. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0047
2352(97)00021-4
