INTRODUCTION
The philosophers are yet to resolve their argument concerning the origin of the knowledge.
The empiricists still argue that knowledge is based on the perception and experience while the rationalists still hocks on the fact that knowledge is inmate ( Vanzo, 2016).
This text outlines that fact that though both rationalists imperialists both have weighty facts, it would be easy to believe the imperialists have the rationalists.
Delegate your assignment to our experts and they will do the rest.
IMPERIALISTS ARE SIMPLE
They believe that knowledge is observable and inefficacious
Unlike the rationalists that claim that expertise is inmate, imperialist gives it a more clear view by arguing that knowledge cannot do anything unless there is perception or experience that invokes the knowledge ( Webb, 2018).
IMPERIALISTS ARE MORE CLEAR ABOUT THE RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN IMAGINATION, EXPERIENCE, AND KNOWLEDGE
Imaginational come from experiences in daily life, and this is the source of knowledge (B ies, Cook & Duffull, 2016).
Take the example of a child. If a child is born with innate experience as rationalists claim, they should walk or talk immediately. However, they need to get the experience by starting at a point, mimicking parents and caretakers before they walk or talk. It means that they have to imagine and gain experience before they know how to do simple things as suggested by imperialists.
INDUCTION IS ANOTHER PROOF OF THE IMPERIALISTS SUPERIORITY
The imperialist argue that very few things can be proven.
The sense of perception helps people understand and know things. For instance, people know that a chalkboard is yellow and rubbed chalkboard is white. However, no person can prove that these perceptions or knowledge agrees with the subjects. Persons can only perceive but cannot prove that after leaving the classroom, the rubbed chalkboard stays white. In this sense, they perceive first before knowing, which shows that imperialist is right.
CONCLUSION
The battle between Imperialists and rationalists about the origin of human knowledge is intense.
However, it is the imperialist that wins the war based on the fact that they are more precise and reasonable on the matter of the origin of knowledge as outlined in this text.
References
Bies, R., Cook, S., &Duffull, S. (2016). The pharmacometrician's dilemma: the tension between mechanistic and empirical approaches in mathematical modeling and simulation–a continuation of the age ‐ old dispute between rationalism and empiricism?. British journal of clinical pharmacology , 82 (3), 580.
Vanzo, A. (2016). Empiricism and rationalism in nineteenth-century histories of philosophy. Journal of the History of Ideas , 77 (2), 253-282.
Webb, W. (2018). Rationalism, empiricism, and evidence-based medicine: a call for a new Galenic synthesis. Medicines , 5 (2), 40.
