1. Koritansky, John C. "Natural Justice and the Nature of Justice in Aristotle's Nicomachean Ethics." Interpretation: A Journal Of Political Philosophy 44, no. 2 (Winter2018 2018): 233-256.
This journal article is authored by Koritansky, John and published in 2018. The publication provides an overview of the statement made by Aristotle on the changeability of natural justice. Upon making this statement, several contemporaries engaged in an argument that Aristotle does not posses the functions of natural justice required to make judgments using political laws and constitutions. This publication, however, attempts to provide a contrasting argument. It is a requirement that the naturalness of natural justice to be understood in relation to the reality that justice belongs to the polis; this is a group of roughly equal individuals under the governance of the same law. Ideally, this group of individuals is natural but in a qualified manner, in a similar way that a hybrid could be regarded as natural. While the Nicomachean Ethics being a type of redemption of the same virtue with the reach of ordinarily decent human beings, there is a close relationship between the justice argument and the idea of making obvious the inferiority of such virtue to the virtue of the philosopher. Eventually, this virtue is agreed upon by Plato and Aristotle as being the most natural and most suitable for humans.
Delegate your assignment to our experts and they will do the rest.
The main strength of this publication lies in its detailed discussion of natural justice drawing from both Aristotle and criticizing contemporaries. The author of the article attempts to make a specification on who does natural justice actually apply to. The author of the article has a major weakness in that he does not provide a solution to the argument between Aristotle and the opposing contemporaries.
2. Bartlett, Robert C. "Aristotle's Introduction to the Problem of Happiness: On Book I of the Nicomachean Ethics." American Journal Of Political Philosophy 52, no. 3 (July 2008): 677-687.
This article was authored by Robert Bartlett in 2008 with the objective of commenting on the nature of human happiness. However, in dealing with human happiness, the author provokes people to raise the challenges that, besides being obvious, the essence of happiness can quickly be forgotten by humans. The principal challenges are inclusive of, the real character of people’s hope for happiness and, ultimately, the need for a form of divine providence upon the realization of hope. Amid longing for happiness, people find themselves undergoing the pull of that need, regardless of the effort it might take. As people attempt to reveal their deepest concern in this way, the concept developed in the article prepares them to buy the idea of Aristotle's “philosophy of human matters”. The thought of Aristotle relates to the reality of providence owing to its natural attributes of life.
This article has the strength of explaining how humans can forget their happiness because of different challenges faced in life. Basically, the author identifies the lack of hope as one of the most significant challenges facing human happiness. However, as a major weakness, Robert does not highlight the circumstances under which the challenges outweigh human happiness.
3. Leibowitz, Uri D. "Particularism in Aristotle's Nicomachean Ethics." Journal Of Moral Philosophy 10, no. 2 (April 2013): 121-147
This is a journal article written by Uri to provide a new particularist version of Aristotle's Nicomachean Ethics. The author is committed to helping the reader solve puzzles surrounding the goals and methods of Aristotle with respect to the Nicomachean Ethics. Also, the article provides an insight into a considerable account of morality – readers have appreciated it as an interesting and plausible account from the onset. The article has the objective of figuring out how to understand the text of the Nicomachean Ethics in the best way. However, the author also aims to add to the contemporary, exciting and controversial argument on particularism. The author hopes that via the approach to a comprehensive particularist reading of Aristotle's Ethics he would achieve the demonstration that a great deal of the mistrust of particularism is misplaced. The author also hopes to demonstrate that the particularist moral theory is the most influential moral theory in the history of philosophy.
The article is significant in providing clarification on the goals and methods of Aristotle in relation to the Nicomachean Ethics. Notably, several readers have not been able to establish the meaning of Nicomachean Ethics as per the writings of Aristotle. However, the article by Uri provides an easy way through which people can enhance their knowledge on Aristotle’s view of Nicomachean Ethics.
4. BLOCK, STEPHEN A., and PATRICK CAIN. "Socrates's Spirited Defense of Knowledge: Continence, Incontinence, and Human Action in Book VII of Aristotle's Nicomachean Ethics." Interpretation: A Journal Of Political Philosophy 42, no. 1 (Fall2015 2015): 3-29.
This is a publication of Stephen and Cain which attempts to enhance readers’ knowledge about the Nicomachean ethics. Notably, in his Nicomachean Ethics, Aristotle offers the most prominent explanation of moral in the history of philosophy; it has, however, been proven to be perplexing, owing to the reality that the explanation culminates in depreciation of human virtue. Considering the history of Aristotle’s Nicomachean ethics, this particular publication provides a new interpretation of his analysis in Book VII of the Ethics which presents the Socratic suggestion that no one "knowingly acts contrary to what is best." According to the authors of this publication, Aristotle affirms that the thesis of Socrates on the mastery of knowledge has its roots on a quest, rooted in spiritedness, with the objective of divinizing the soul and the restriction of the mere virtue of humans. The authors have attempted to relate Aristotle's study of continence and incontinence to the challenge of the relation involving people and the divine used by Aristotle in the introduction and conclusion of Book VII, alongside his ignored explanation of spiritedness in Book VI.
This publication is significant in that it adds more weight to the Socratic claim that every human act according to his/her best-perceived manner. To a great extent, the behavior of humans is guided by their virtues. Nicomachean ethics dictate that a person ought to follow his virtues and act to the best of their definition. The authors, however, exhibit limitation in their interpretation of good Socratic values.
5. MASCARENHAS, VIJAY. 2010. "God and the Good in Aristotle's Nicomachean Ethics." Epoché: A Journal For The History Of Philosophy 15, no. 1: 35-59.
Vijay authors this publication, in his examination of the systematic relationship between theology, ethics, and teleology the Nicomachean Ethics addressed by Aristotle. The author has touched on four principal interpretational aporiai: the immanence v. transcendence of God, the obvious illogicality of the opening lines, the "inclusivist" v. "dominant" perspectives of eudaimonia, and the apparent contradiction between contemplation as the highest good and practical virtue. Vijay displays how good attention to the relationship between Aristotle's notion of the Good as "that aimed by everything" and God as the prime unmoved mover.
This publication is highly significant as it is one of the few works detailing the relationship between theology, ethics, and teleology the Nicomachean Ethics. Ideally, a reader who is interested in the views of Aristotle on Nicomachean Ethics would find a lot of relevant information in Vijay’s publication of the year 2010. However, the author shows a limitation in focus on the views of Aristotle, while several other philosophers have expressed different views on the same issue.
6. Heinze, Eric. "The meta-ethics of law: Book One of Aristotle's Nicomachean Ethics." International Journal Of Philosophical Law 6, no. 1 (March 2010): 23-44.
In this publication, Eric explains how traditional scholarship has viewed Aristotle's Nicomachean Ethics as the scheme of positive ethics. The author points out that has been no much focus on the work's meta-ethics; ideally, this is the argument of Aristotle regarding what systems of positive ethics ought to support to be regarded an ethical theory. According to Eric, Book One of the Nicomachean Ethics has the objective of introducing readers to Aristotle's system of positive ethics and differentiating meta-ethical principles, which can undergo independent evaluation of all perspectives that might be taken of the positive ethics of Aristotle. The legal theory of Aristotle is within his ethical theory; those standards represent a meta-ethics of law. According to the legal meta-ethics of Aristotle, the law supports a concept of the 'good'; dialectics; purpose; the most outstanding constitution; objectivist ethics; and positive ethics.
The work of Eric has considerable strength in relating the essence of Nicomachean Ethics to the legal system of a society. Ideally, the author emphasizes the need to provide members of the society with the best constitution and positive ethics which are believed to mold good character and virtues among humans. As Aristotle’s views seem more philosophical, it is necessary to explore the relationship between Nicomachean Ethics and the law of the land.
