In the US about 23% of Americans own a gun or more guns. Equally, it is estimated that the US has about 88 guns per 100 persons, which makes it the utmost total and per capital in the world ( Buz, 6) . As such, there has been controversy over the enactment of more gun control laws in the US. The support for more gun control laws believe that gun violent behavior would lessen, that restriction laws have been there before and that majority of Americans are in support of new gun restrictions whereas the opponents argue that guns are required for self-defense from both local and foreign invaders and that gun possession deters crime slightly than causing more crime. My position on this issue is that there should be an enactment of more gun control laws.
In regard to my position on there are premises that are opposed to my view of introducing more gun control in the US. One of such premise is that the Second Amendment to the US Charter protects individual gun ownership. Secondly, is that gun control laws do not deter crime; gun ownership deters crime and the third premise is gun control laws infringe upon the right to self-defense and deny people a sense of safety ( Buz, 11) .
Delegate your assignment to our experts and they will do the rest.
The interesting thing about the Second Amendment is that it has been protecting gun possession in the US since time immemorial. Believing in this view, you will notice that introducing more gun control legislations will be an infringement on the peoples’ right to own guns and other arms. This idea might be true on condition that the Second Amendment protects civilians who intend to use the gun for traditional legal purposes, for instance, for self-defense at home ( Buz, 14) .
The interesting thing about gun control laws do not deter crime; gun ownership deters crime is that in the 20 th century there was an increase in arms possession in the US, yet the murder rate decreased. In believing this view you will notice that States that registered highest gun ownership equally recorded greatest drops in violent crimes ( Buz, 15) . This idea is true in the sense that people believe that owning a gun guards them against being victimized; if arms are banned; only criminal will have arms.
The interesting thing about the view that gun control laws infringe upon the right to self-defense and deny people a sense of safety is that the only thing which stops a bad guy with a gun is a good guy with a gun. If you believe in this view you will notice that the freedom to self-defense and to the means of defending oneself is a fundamental natural right that emanates out of the right to life thus gun control laws interferes with the capacity of law-abiding citizens to protect themselves against outlaws ( Buz, 15) . This idea might be true in the sense that about 37 states in the US guard the right to accept arms for self-defense purposes.
In conclusion, more gun control laws argument looks conflicting. As a result, employing the believing game makes both sides of the argument somehow valid. Thus, by employing the believing game it helps us to consider the large framework of reference and well again ideas.
References
Buz, W. "Point-Counterpoint Debate: Should We Have Stricter Gun Control Laws? – No," www.dcourier.com, Jan. 5, 2013
