Gregory Pence offers a theoretical structure for further discussion concerning the real significance of work employing an examination of diverse strategies that are manifested as calling, workmanship, and labor. Pence (2001) look at the variance between various historical contexts on how the concepts work. At the same time, Pence analyses its shortcomings. According to Pence (2001), a preliminary hypothesis of work needs to be evident concerning conceptual shortages of previous theoretical arguments. Thus, Pence looks at various inaccuracies common in the examinations of the previous topic of work. Pence maintains that clarity in thinking about the issue helps in dealing with political and social challenges that may arise from work as prescribed by capitalistic ideologies.
Pence share much of his ideology and theory with Rawl's theory of justice. According to Rawl's theory of justice, a desirable state is that with equal distribution of resources. At the same time, Rawl's theory holds that inequality can be acceptable only if the least advantaged in society benefits. Such, according to Pence, is what is required of work. The required position is a concept or concepts that capture the sophisticated aspect of non-reductionists. At the same time, Pence maintains that leaders and institutional management must encounter the moral, political challenge on the rewards people need for their work-involvement (Pence, 2001). Pence perspective and approach does confront social utility question on the features that promote people to work.
Delegate your assignment to our experts and they will do the rest.
Pence apply the conceptual scheme founded within the principles of Rawl's theory of justice. Despite not being a perfect concept, Pence argues that Rawl's position and approach is an excellent place to begin. For example, by the application and use of the theory, it is possible to develop fundamental principles that are vital in establishing paradigms of bad and good work. However, this may also face a challenge, especially in judging a worker's work as either good or bad.
Engineering Ethics, Lecture 9
The video clip addresses the professional work environment by Prof. Kevin Passino. According to Passino (2015) engineering ethics entails all moral frameworks, codes of ethics, professionalism; of engineering that encompass all work-related features such as risk, safety, and honesty. Passino (2015) focuses on social justice, volunteerism/humanitarian, and electrical and computer engineering (Passino, 2015). According to Passino (2015) professionalism entails personal commitment, ethical conduct, excitement and fun, and competence. At the same time, in line with an engineer’s commitment and behavior at work, an engineer needs to maintain and uphold top performance and professionalism at all times within the workplace. An engineer must thus focus on the most important concepts within and at work. Such include issues such as the dress code, collegiality and loyalty, confidentiality, and upholding management policies. These are critical to helping an engineer set a professional attitude towards work, duties, and responsibilities.
Policies play a critical component of professionalism. According to Passino (2015) it is vital to pursue only essential things within the workplace and avid scenarios that may be counter-productive and detrimental to one’s professional work (Passino, 2015). Such include kickbacks, trading in insider information, gifts, and bribes. An engineer’s rights are fundamental as they form a vital component of professionalism. For example, the right of professional conscience is instrumental in setting the right professional tone in practicing ethical values and conduct within the workplace. Other rights include the right to privacy, among others, that form an essential part of a holistic work environment. These also involve moral guidelines such as whistleblowing and raising of issues in line with the established workplace ethical values. Passino (2015) maintains that it is critical to uphold and adhere to established work ethics and integrity while at the work place and even outside the working environment.
References
Pence, G. (2001). Towards a theory of work. Philosophy and the Problems of Work: A Reader , 93-105.
Pissano, K. M. (2015, October 5). Engineering Ethics, Lecture 9. Retrieved October 6, 2019, from https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zAbpAJcbk7E&=&feature=youtu.be.
