The right to privacy is the idea that one’s information is protected from the public or unauthorized access. Louis Brandeis of the US Justice Department often referred to it as “the right to be left alone”. While not directly indicated in the US Constitution, amendments could offer more protection. It has been found important after a while to interpret the real nature and the limits of a person’s protection and belongings. One clear thing is the conflict between privacy and technology. The latest improvements in technology and methods of doing business have attacked domestic life, and many mechanical tools will likely make it hard to enjoy private communications. Since 1923, the Supreme Court has categorically stated the liberty guarantee of the 14 th Amendment to ensure a fairly wide right of privacy that has come to include decisions about having children, marriage, and medical care. Most Americans are for this favorable interpretation of the constitution (Richards, 2017). In 1990, the Supreme Court stated in Cruzan v Missouri Health Department that people have a freedom interest that involves the right to decide to terminate medical treatments that go on for life. In 2003, the Supreme Court in Texas pointed out that the state had violated the liberty clause of some gay people when it pressed charges against them forbidding the same-sex practice. Reporting for the Court, Kennedy the present Justice insisted on the protection of the constitution of privacy (Nissenbaum, 2018). One specific privacy right that I particularly feel strongly about is the right to abortion which has been contentious since the founding of American civilization. The Supreme Court upheld an important right to privacy in 1973 under the due process clause of the 14 th Amendment. The court defined this freedom aiming at protecting women who want to terminate their pregnancies, with the state required to prove and defend any restrictions it places on this right by proving beyond reasonable doubt its interest in the case (Nissenbaum, 2018). In my opinion, it is justified for the state to honor an individual’s desire to terminate pregnancy. The state should ensure that both the right to privacy and the health of individual are protected.
References
Nissenbaum, H. (2018). Respecting context to protect privacy: Why meaning matters. Science and engineering ethics , 24 (3), 831-852. https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s11948-015-9674-9 .
Delegate your assignment to our experts and they will do the rest.
Richards, D. A. J. (2017). Sexual Autonomy and the Constitutional Right to Privacy: A Case Study in Human Rights and the Unwritten Constitution. In Sexual Orientation and Rights (pp. 71-132). Routledge. https://www.taylorfrancis.com/books/e/9781315243375/chapters/10.4324/9781315243375-2 .
