The style that best harmonizes with my decision making is the analytical decision-making style. In many situations that I have faced, I tend to avoid reaching a conclusion about an issue or situation without knowing more about the issue or the situation. When talking with someone, I gather more information by asking questions, asking for clarifications and attempting to rephrase what others mean and repeating it to them for their confirmation to ensure that I am on the right pathway. Even after getting the information I need, I must take time to try to see their deep meanings by considering my past experiences, the body language of people and the existing issue or situation to search for any patterns or insights. I might also focus on specific words that my colleagues or friends use in most conversations and attempt to compare their use in the current conversation and what they mean. I achieve this by writing down a list of the conclusions that I draw from observing an event or from my discussions with others. I will then reach the main conclusions by combining several conclusions from the list while eliminating others, which usually takes time.
The analytical decision-making style is beneficial because I only use facts when solving a problem or making a decision. I also reach a final conclusion only after acquiring more details about an issue or a situation, which ensures that I only make informed decisions. Another benefit is that I utilize logic to make decisions without the need for outsiders as the style emphasizes independent working. The style, however, has several weaknesses. For example, the potential for overanalyzing or avoiding a situation increases when I am under stress, which may lead to poor decisions. The emphasis on facts and accuracy also means that I must avoid feelings even if the situation necessitates emotions, which other people can consider as being emotionally distant.
Delegate your assignment to our experts and they will do the rest.
