Matthew, Mark and Luke form the synoptic gospels since they contain much of similar material. Matthew and Luke's books capture most of the stories that are also told in the book of Mark; however, Matthew and Luke also share most of the stories that are not in the book of Mark. The Gospel of John omits much of the material found in the three books, even though it has a significant amount of materials that are not found in the books of Matthew, Mark and Luke. Having these stories side by side seems to complement one another because one can observe that John's gospel appears to supplement the other gospels. The gospel of John added more information to the events discussed in the other three books.
One of the benefits of synoptic gospels is that it enables people to understand theology presented in the four books of the gospel. By laying out the differences and similarities side by side, the Bible draws attention to details that one might have missed. It also clarifies the documented life of Jesus and corresponding theological teachings. In contemporary life, three gospel accounts play a vital role in enhancing Christianity's experience. The three books seem to ascertain that the holy spirit inspired people to write the Bible, conveying similar information.
Delegate your assignment to our experts and they will do the rest.
Even though the gospels share a cohesive story about Jesus, variances are also evident, and this was inevitable since the gospel was written by different sources addressing different audiences. Chronological discrepancies have been highlighted in the four gospels, for instance, the number of men possessed by demons in the book of Mathew 8:28 and Mar k5:2. Such differences in these books seem to bring in credibility issues concerning the books of the gospel. Even though differences are found in the gospel books, some information is similar and seems to complement one another.
