TOBACCO FREE RESTAURANT LOGIC MODEL |
|||||||
| Inputs | Outputs | Outcomes | Assumptions | External Factors | Examples | Importance of each Example Component | Contribution of each component to the evaluation of the effectiveness of this program |
| Funding | Public information campaign | Improved public awareness amongst community members. | Involve all stakeholders in the community. |
Retaliatory reactions: Tobacco industry players unleash flashy campaigns to encourage smoking in restaurant. |
Public campaigns will take the fashion of public debates, musicals and caravan road shows. | Public campaign are important to change the perception and attitudes of stakeholders. | Evaluation can be done by assessing the funding component to determine if the public has been sufficiently enlightened on the aims of the program. |
| Trainers and Modules | Workshops | Change of attitudes by restaurant owners. | Frequent workshops to ensure every stakeholder participate to the end. |
Social factors: Apathy and indifference. |
Workshops will take place in community halls involving restaurant owners and community leaders | Workshops are important to bring stakeholders together. | Evaluation of the Trainers and Modules component can indicate if the workshops were effective. |
| Forge Partnerships | Public Campaigns | Restaurant owners influenced by celebrity campaigns. | Mutual beneficial partnership to guarantee commitment and dedication. | Local influential persons may refuse to partner with the project. | Partnerships should be forged with faith based organizations as well as sports clubs | Partnerships forge long term ties that will guarantee sustainable efforts. | Evaluation of the program can be done by assessing the strength of forged partnerships. |
| Lobbying to policy makers | Favorable policies effected | Favorable policies implemented and enforced e.g. Smoking Free Day | Continual lobbying to show seriousness of the matter at hand. |
Political factors: Local political leaders may not support the cause |
Lobby by Pledging to vouch for the candidature of policy makers who wish to venture or continue with politics. | Lobbying helps to build pressure and support from higher authorities. | Evaluation can be done by analyzing the manner and effectiveness of lobbying directed to policy makers. |
References
HealthBridge Foundation of Canada, Vietnam Office. (2017). Strengthening Implementation of Smoke Free in Restaurants in Hanoi. Hanoi: Health Bridge.
Delegate your assignment to our experts and they will do the rest.
Media campaigns….Fosson, G. H., McCallum, D. M., & Conaway, M. B. (2014). Peer Reviewed:
Antismoking Mass Media Campaigns and Support for Smoke-Free Environments, Mobile County, Alabama, 2011–2012. Preventing chronic disease , 11 .
Outreach Partnerships….. Díaz-Toro, E. C., Fernández, M. E., Correa-Fernández, V., Calo, W.A., Ortiz, A.
P., Mejía, L. M., ... & Wetter, D. W. (2014). Promoting tobacco cessation and smoke-free workplaces through community outreach partnerships in Puerto Rico. Progress in community health partnerships: research, education, and action , 8 (2), 157.
Uang, R., Hiilamo, H., & Glantz, S. A. (2016). Accelerated adoption of smoke-free laws after ratification of the World Health Organization framework convention on tobacco control. American journal of public health , 106 (1), 166-171.
NSW Government. (2016, September 16). Smoke Fre Commercial Outdoor Dining Laws . Retrieved from NSW Government: http://www.health.nsw.gov.au/tobacco/Pages/outdoor-dining.aspx
