Training Nursing Skills: A Quantitative Study of Nursing Students’ Experiences before and after Clinical Practice.
The methods used were those of a typical clinical trial with the study being a descriptive quantitative design having been carried out over a 6-month period with questionnaires given to the participants at the start and end of the study period.
Delegate your assignment to our experts and they will do the rest.
Protection of human rights
The study began by observing basic guidelines for clinical trials by getting the approval of the Norwegian Social Data Services. By getting this approval, the researchers demonstrated that it was concerned about working within the guidelines put in place for clinical trials involving humans. By using questionnaires designed to capture the experience of the participants, the study ensured that they were not exposed to pain or discomfort, in addition to them benefitting from the study results which would help improve their clinical experiences. The study can, therefore, a positive effort to ensure protection of human rights. The participants were also given the option to choose whether to participate in the study or not and this was done both verbally and in writing, and also in good time (two to four weeks).
Research design
The question in the study concerned a possible causal relationship between the experience the students had before the clinical practice and their satisfaction with the clinical practice. The research design used in the study is quite appropriate for the question that is being asked in the study as it allows the participants to give their opinions on the effectiveness of the lab trials conducted before the clinical practice. The intervention used in the study was the availability of supervisors for the students and how the supervisors played their roles. The intervention was different for the control group and the project group and was described in detail which is representative of a good research design. The design also minimized threats to the internal validity of the study by discussing with the supervisors about their roles and what is expected to ensure an equal approach for both groups.
Population and sample
The population to be studied is described well and in detail; it was the 1 st year nursing students in the Bachelors of Nursing program The whole population of 160 students was considered for the study before being divided into two groups, the project and the control group. Random sampling was used to divide the group into the two subgroups. This was probably not the best sampling technique as there could have been other attributes within the population that would have required to be considered such as the age of the participants, their experience and even their gender. The representation of these attributes within the subgroups is therefore unclear and could probably have an effect on the behavior of the subgroups. The sampling for the larger group is good but the sampling of the subgroups could have been better if stratified random sampling would have been used for the subgroups.
Data Collection and measurement
Data collection was efficient with the key variable, which was the students’ experiences, captured within the questionnaires handed over to the students. There was also congruence between the variables in the research as described in the introduction of the study and as stated in the methods section. However, there was no evidence provided to show that the methods used for data collection were reliable and valid. This lack of evidence represented a weakness in the study’s data collection and measurement. Procedures An intervention is applied on the control group where they are exposed to more supervisors in addition to the supervisors being more involved in the activities the students were involved in. This intervention was described in detail with evidence given as to how the intervention was applied to the group. The data was all collected through questionnaires at the beginning and end of the study period minimizing any bias that would have been brought about if the supervisors were to collect the data.
Lall et al. (2019). Influences on the Implementation of Mobile Learning for Medical and Nursing Education: Qualitative Systematic Review by the Digital Health Education Collaboration.
The method used was qualitative being a systematic review of studies done on the topic of mLearning in medical and nursing education.
Protection of participants' rights
The study did not involve any participants thus it posed no danger or discomfort to any individuals. This lack of participants also means that there was no need to request for permission from any board.
Research design and research tradition
The study employed a tradition where findings of existing studies are used to uncover the opinions and perspectives of various relevant people with regards to the topic in question. The research question was concerned about the views of learners and educators with regards to mLearning and a qualitative study seemed like the best type of study to respond to this question. The research design was well described with a protocol used to determine the scope and methods to be used in the study; this protocol was registered with the international prospective register of systematic reviews showing the study’s commitment to ensuring the research design was efficient and reliable.
Sample and setting
The population of interest was well described in the study which was various studies that involved the exploration of mLearning strategies for medical and nursing education. A four-step system was then used to collect the sample for the study. This included identification of studies; screening of identified studies; eligibility of screened studies; nclusion of eligible screened studies into the study. Purposeful sampling was used in the study and this was the best option for the study as it would provide information that was specifically relevant to the topic in question; mLearning in medical and nursing education.
Data Collection
Data collection in the study was initialized by three authors who analyzed the various themes in the selected studies and coded them according to the FRAME model discussed in the introduction. This model used in data collection was appropriate as it considered how mobile technology influenced learning processes from an informational perspective. The rersearches also collected enough data and this was shown in the study with a table showing the long list of themes analyzed and the views of people with regards to the themes. The data collection method wing gritive the data collected to have enough depth and richness.
Procedures
The data collection procedures were well described with the study detailing how the authors would analyze the selected studies and what framework they would use in choosing the various themes in the studies and the responses to these themes. To reduce bias, the data collectors all used the same model to analyze the data and an extra author familiarized themselves with the studies analyzed to further analyze the data. This helped reduce the bias in the data collection procedures.
Enhancement of trustworthiness
To Begin with, the protocol used to develop the scope and methods in the study was registered with the international prospective register of systematic reviews. This shows the confidence the researchers had in the strategies they were using. The analysis procedures were also described in detail which allowed one to audit and confirm the findings of the study which enhanced the trustworthiness of the study. The study, however, did not document any strategies used to enhance the quality of the procedures chosen for analysis of the data which was a weakness but it did not significantly affect the high trustworthiness that the study had achieved already.
References
Lall, P., Rees, R., Law, G. C. Y., Dunleavy, G., Cotic, Z., & Car, J. (2019). Influences on the SUMMARIES OF RESEARCH ARTICLES 7 implementation of mobile learning for medical and nursing education: Qualitative systematic review by the digital health collaboration. Journal of Medical Internet Research , 21(2); e12895. doi:10.2196/12895
Solvik, E., & Struksnes, S. (2018). Training nursing skills: A quantitative study of nursing students’ experiences before and after clinical practice. Nursing Research and Practice , 2018, 1-9. https://doi.org/10.1155/2018/8984028
