The use of drones by police officers to maintain law and order has become a topic of discussion in law enforcement organizations. The high rate at which police officers are switching to the non-military application as a new method to curb crimes has left many with the question as to whether the use of drones should be accepted or not (Rogers & Scally, 2018) . It is rather apparent that drones have helped much in the war against crimes in such ways as through sharpshooter. Police view from the drone can locate a shooter and the surrounding environment in which the incident takes place (Bindemann et al., 2017) . Drones help to analyze crimes and accident scenes that require forensic professionals quickly. It is beneficial to use technology in fighting crimes as it makes the process easier and can help locate the criminal scene faster. Drones are cheaper to operate and can engage in widespread surveillance over a short period.
There should be a limit on how the government should be allowed to proceed when it comes to the potential inversion of personal property. Most people feel insecure when their private property becomes invaded, primarily through government surveillance. Private property should only be invaded without the owner’s consent in the event of serious crimes such as murder. Government inversion should be stopped as it as well poses a threat to the property owners (Park & Kim, 2017) .
Delegate your assignment to our experts and they will do the rest.
Drone aerial surveillance should require a search warrant. The use of drones should be prohibited unless the government obtains a search warrant. The police officers should not be allowed to use drones unless they get a permit, which points out that a crime has been committed or is about to be determined (Calo, 2011). Drone surveillance poses harm to private property, and it should not be encouraged because it is a privacy violation.
References
Bindemann, M., Fysh, M. C., Sage, S. S., Douglas, K., & Tummon, H. M. (2017). Person identification from aerial footage by a remote-controlled drone. Scientific Reports , 7 (1), 1-10.
Calo, M. R. (2011). The drone as a privacy catalyst. Stan. L. Rev. Online , 64 , 29.
Park, H. H., & Kim, S. H. (2017). Discussions on Regulation and Use of Police Drones. The Journal of the Korea Contents Association , 17 (7), 408-415.
Rogers, C., & Scally, E. J. (2018). Police use of technology: Insights from the literature. International Journal of Emergency Services .
