Survey research involves the study of a particular outcome using replies from certain respondents. Various organizations use this method as a way of ascertaining specific concepts and utilize the information collected to make various decisions. Government agencies use survey research in making policies and reforms that improve their operations in the long-run. This process also helps various stakeholders in describing a systematic body of information, draw an accurate inference from a given sample, and developing an event-causal relationship. Public administrators use survey research in analyzing and supporting various policies and reforms for the population’s wellbeing.
Describe the Systematic Body of Information
The first use of survey research involves developing and explaining certain systematic bodies of information to various stakeholders. Many researchers intend to develop certain concepts when undertaking a particular study. The information derived from those researches helps different stakeholders including public administrators to develop a specific information block that can guide certain policies (Story & Tait, 2019). For instance, the government may plan to initiate a certain program meant to benefit the public. However, the program may not give the desired outcome and thus a need for a proper audit to determine the cause of such results. Research may reveal causes for such phenomena which may include lack of support by different stakeholders and inadequate funds to finance the project (Marvasti, 2018). Such information helps public administrators to describe a certain system data before formulating a particular reform.
Delegate your assignment to our experts and they will do the rest.
Drawing an Accurate Inference from a Given Sample
One of the major features of public administration is transparency in almost all activities. Administrators may be required to present facts about a particular decision for public approval. As one of the major biblical principles, transparency involves presenting the truth about a certain issue irrespective of the expected reaction by the information’s recipient (Vannette & Krosnick, 2017). Researchers may be required to question every individual in a given locality to get an exact picture of a particular problem. However, the whole process may not be possible as the total number of respondents exceeds the researchers’ capabilities. The experts can rely on a small sample to draw an accurate inference about a problem. A research survey guides stakeholders involved in a specific study to select and develop an appropriate sample to use in deriving certain outcomes (Buta et al., 2016). As a result, public administrators will minimize the costs incurred in undertaking various studies. A research survey may only require a small sample in making a certain conclusion about a problem.
Deriving Concepts for Certain Events
Survey research assists public administrators to derive concepts which act as mirrors of certain event or object. The process follows certain procedures like collection and analysis of data in arriving at a specific conclusion. Such results depict various concepts public administrators and other government officers can use in formulating various policies. Those experts face confusion as they analyses masses of details and information about a particular occurrence. To understand those events, public administrators need to follow a given research method that will guarantee accuracy to the outcome. Using a research survey will also help government officers to compile the critical elements in a particular event. One does not have to gather every detail when undertaking a study as it may prove tiresome or too expensive for the government agency.
Developing an Event-causal Relationship
The history of a problem is a major biblical principle that describes how a particular issue arose. This theory attempts to explain causes that contribute to a given occurrence by tracing a particular sequence. An event occurs due to certain factors thus the need to investigate those elements when developing remedies for different problems. Research survey includes formulating an event-causal relationship in understanding the root of a particular problem (Meier et al., n.d.) . This method helps public administrators to develop policies or reforms that would prevent the repeat of a certain problem. The most common procedure in formulating an event-causal relationship involves identifying four critical elements from the data provided. First, the research survey traces the time order of a particular event to another factor. For instance, if B caused event A, then the former must have preceded the latter. If the researchers found this phenomenon not to be the case, they can rule out B as a likely contributor to the occurrence of event A. The second element in developing a causal relationship is the covariation or statistical relation between two variables. For instance, if data in A changes due to an adjustment in B, then the two might have a statistical relationship and thus one might be the cause of the other. Public administrators can use these findings to make a particular conclusion without analyzing all the data presented (Ponto, 2015). This strategy saves government agencies’ resources and allows experts to make timely recommendations. Other elements to include in developing an event-causal relationship include a relationship between two variables that cannot be explained by a third factor and theories for each phenomenon.
Public administrators use survey research in analyzing and supporting various policies and reforms for the population’s wellbeing. Before making certain decisions, those experts need to analyze a particular problem and the available information. Public administrators may also need to use specific samples instead of the entire data when researching a particular problem. Some of the use of survey research include developing causal relationships, deriving concepts, and making inferences from various samples. Those strategies minimize the cost of a particular study while helping stakeholders make timely decisions.
References
Buta, B. J., Walston, J. D., Godino, J. G., Park, M., Kalyani, R. R., Xue, Q. L., … Varadhan, R. (2016). Frailty assessment instruments: Systematic characterization of the uses and contexts of highly-cited instruments. Ageing Research Reviews . https://doi.org/10.1016/j.arr.2015.12.003
Marvasti, A. (2018). Research methods. In The Cambridge Handbook of Social Problems . https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108656184.003
Meier et al., (2010). Applied statistics for public and nonprofit administration (8th ed.). Wadsworth.
Ponto, J. (2015). Understanding and Evaluating Survey Research. Journal of the Advanced Practitioner in Oncology .
Story, D. A., & Tait, A. R. (2019). Survey Research. Anesthesiology . https://doi.org/10.1097/ALN.0000000000002436
Vannette, D. L., & Krosnick, J. A. (2017). The Palgrave Handbook of Survey Research. In The Palgrave Handbook of Survey Research . https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-54395-6
