Metheny, Davis-Jackson, & Stewart (2010) have generalized the research setting. The place of the performance of the quantitative study regarding the effectiveness of an aspiration risk reduction protocol has not been specified in the research. Sometimes, the various factors influencing the results of a particular study could be specific to a place across the globe (Moore et al., 2015). Therefore, the importance of specifying the area where the data has been collected lies in the various drivers of the study that may be tied to the place where the research has been performed (Moore et al., 2015). The generalization of the research setting reduces the credibility and the validity of the research as it cannot apply to a given area of expertise such as medical practice (Moore et al., 2015). The mention of the location of research also contributes to the expounding of the future studies in the various healthcare institutions across the globe.
Metheny, Davis-Jackson & Stewart (2010) have also had the limitation of application to practice in their research. The authors have not stated how the research is relevant to the medical practice. They also have not had an in-depth elaboration of the respondents that they involved in their quantitative study. The participants of the research have to be involved in medical practice in a way to contribute to the application in the medical practice (Thorne, 2016). The methodology section should also be linked with the findings and the conclusions of the research in a way that connects how the various healthcare practitioners can apply the research to the medical practice (Thorne, 2016). The validity of research, in that case, can be justified by the linkage found between the methods of data collection and the findings. Having in mind the applications of the various studies to current medical practices also improves the validity of the research.
Delegate your assignment to our experts and they will do the rest.
References
Metheny, N. A., Davis-Jackson, J., & Stewart, B. J. (2010). Effectiveness of an aspiration risk-
Reduction protocol. Nursing Research , 59 (1), 18.
Moore, G. F., Audrey, S., Barker, M., Bond, L., Bonell, C., Hardeman, W., ... & Baird, J. (2015).
Process evaluation of complex interventions: Medical Research Council guidance. BMJ , 350 , h1258.
Thorne, S. (2016). Interpretive description . Routledge.
