Criminology has been ridiculed to pay little attention to violence against animals. Vegan criminology entails focus placed on animal rights and also rights of those who are trying to protect the animals. This also includes attempts made to protect the animal through documentation and prevention of animals being used as sport, entertainment, and experimentation. Vegan criminology can be classified as collective criminology. With the little knowledge of animal right, many people have knowingly or unknowingly abused animals (Arluke, Levin, Carter & Ascione, 2008). Moreover, research has proved many people prefer to eat animal products as opposed to plant products. Therefore, this results in more livestock production and the number of animals slaughtered have significantly increased over the years. During research, animals are used or experimentation first before a product can be used on humans. Additionally, many animals are used as forms of entertainment which are against animal rights.
Corporate crime also referred as white collar crime often do not regard themselves as criminals as they do not consider their activities incriminating. Corporate crime qualifies as collective violence, the reason being a corporate crime is often engineered by a group of people whose aim is to gain much from others (Tilly, 2003). Example, the Republicans what to reverse and appeal the Obamacare which has helped many poor Americans gain adorable healthcare. With the government willingness to amend and remove the Obamacare means many people will lose the affordable health plans as many cannot afford health insurance. Therefore, despite corporate crime often noted as not so incriminating as many of those doing it have made crime their sole livelihood, it is collective violence.
Delegate your assignment to our experts and they will do the rest.
Destruction of species and Mother Nature is collective violence. It takes more than one person to have a significant impact on nature. It is often told, when people destroy nature, nature will destroy them. Therefore, it takes several individuals to affect negatively the environment holistically (Tilly, 2003). What prevents people from acting to stop collective violence is first, they do not have a personal initiative to take responsibility. Second, animals and species are seen as assets whose purpose is to bring humans wealth and little expected in return. Third, there is limited information concerning animal rights available in different sites and platforms. Finally, many individuals do not treat animals and plant species with the needed concern and respect. In summary, corporate crime and vegan criminology can be considered as collective violence as they entail engagement by a significant number of people responding to particular incitements.
References
Arluke, A., Levin, J., Carter, L., & Ascione, F. (2008) The New Vegetarians: Promoting Health and Protecting Life. New York, USA: Plenum Press.
Tilly, C. (2003). The politics of collective violence . England: Cambridge University Press.
