How would you assess conflicting viewpoints on Facebook privacy from an ethical and social responsibility perspective?
There are different conflicting viewpoints on the issue of Facebook privacy. Some people hold that Facebook has the liberty to apply online identity technology which entails disseminating public domain information to the external world. On the other hand, a section of persons feels that Facebook is going against the user’s rights to privacy so that they can generate more profits. According to the article, Is There a Right to Privacy on Facebook? In as much as it is free for users to engage on social media channels, firms such as Facebook are viewed as businesses. This suggests that they are expected to make money so that they can keep on running.
Delegate your assignment to our experts and they will do the rest.
In my view, one of the functions of Facebook is providing individuals with the power to connect and make the universe more open and close. However, we cannot ignore the fact that the users are granted too much power which in most instances they end up abusing that power. Due to the millions of active users sharing emails, pictures, and addresses every day the aspect of an open community develops to become a security threat for the individuals who share their personal information hence causing a breeding ground for grumbling. From an ethical and social responsibility perspective, there is need to come up with limitations that will determine how those who have access to personal information may use it, especially outside Facebook.
Does the broad immunity that internet platforms have enjoyed since 1996 for their users' speech still work for today's internet, where bad actors can spread hate speech, fake news and violent messages?
During the 1996 era, internet platforms have enjoyed broad immunity particularly for their users’ speech which has reduced in today’s world. Notably, in the early days of the internet, it was broadly accepted that internet channels are supposed to be secured from any violation from the sovereign power and government. For instance, there have been allegations brought forward against Facebook based on its systematic political preference which depicts the issue of internet platform immunity. In the past, people who spread fake news were not held liable although there is different checkpoint on different internet channels that seek to regulate the information that is controlled. Nonetheless, despite these measures, there is free circulation of false news, violent messages and hate speech hence depicting the ineffectiveness of these checkpoints and enhancing internet platform immunity.
Mark Zuckerberg has come to you today to help formulate a plan of action for
the company. Given the pace of events, you have little time. What advice would you give him?
It is crucial for Mark Zuckerberg to note that internet platforms such as Facebook enhance a global ecosystem of social interaction. Therefore, life is believed to revolve around the network through various comments, status updates, and political advocacy, amongst others. Drawing from the article What Should Mark Zuckerberg Do? Zuckerberg is advised to ensure that Facebook should come up with a way it will provide its dedication to user privacy regardless of the open identity technology as well as addressing the issue of security. Facebook should have the ability to control information collected by the app developers hence fostering the idea of bringing the country the universe close together.
What should Mark Zuckerberg do to handle Facebook data privacy and fake news going forward in a more “socially responsible” way?
Conclusively, Zuckerberg needs to carry on very cautiously both behind the scenes and the public to maintain the company’s user base, designer incentives as well as the potential of the company. Subsequently, this will help the company to continue operating and generating outstanding talent. Thus, to address the issue of Facebook information privacy and fake news, Zuckerberg needs to conduct a software overhaul since no one wins in a system that enhances lying to the public. Subsequently, it is crucial for the CEO to embrace transparency especially the aspect of algorithms in which the firm curate the newsfeeds hence developing a trusted platform free from fake news, violent messages and hate speech.
