American president, Lyndon B. Johnson, signed the Voting Rights Act of 1965 into law to overcome the legal barriers that hindered African Americans from exercising their constitutional right of voting as per the 15 th amendment to the country. Subsequently, Congress amended the Voting Rights Act of 1965 consistently to provide more protection and implementation scope. Shelby County. v. Holder - 570 U.S. 529, 133 S. Ct. 2612 (2013) illustrates the unconstitutional provisions of the Voting Rights Act (1965) based on the Tenth Amendment to the U.S. Constitution because the law uses more than 40 years past data to deduce constitutional coverage in the voting provisions (Menendian, 2013). The Voting Rights Act of 1965 promotes an ineffective representation of contemporary needs. Subsequently, Shelby County. v. Holder - 570 U.S. 529, 133 S. Ct. 2612 (2013) supports more restrictive voting regulations or laws in various states.
The state of Texas’ voter identification law portrays stringent provisions hindering the voting exercise of citizens in the state. Texas's photo identification law would affect the photo approval of registered voters for the Hispanic population. Texas's photo identification law requires voters to present photo identification during the voting day to match with the voting roll of the state, subsequently affecting the voting rights of persons with name alterations and some married women. The redirecting map of Texas protects white incumbents while altering the districts or areas with the minority incumbents in the state (Brandeisky, Chen, & Tigas, 2014). The voter purging of Florida in 2012 violates the voter registration law because the purging exercise affects the voting rights of the Hispanic population in the state.
Delegate your assignment to our experts and they will do the rest.
In my opinion, the changes in the voters' rights continue to prohibit voters of specific race population from exercising their voting rights in various states such as Florida, Texas, Virginia, and Mississippi. Accordingly, continuous regulation of voting exercise by the federal government in different states in the U.S. would prevent discriminations and protect the voting rights of the minority population in the country.
References
Brandeisky, K., Chen, H., & Tigas, M. (2014). Everything That's Happened Since Supreme Court Ruled on the Voting Rights Act. New York City . ProPublica. Retrieved from https://www.propublica.org/article/voting-rights-by-state-map
Menendian, S. (2013). Shelby County v. Holder: Extend voting rights nationwide . UC Berkeley blog. Retrieved from https://blogs.berkeley.edu/2013/06/29/shelby-county-v-holder-extend-voting-rights-nationwide/
