War causes aftermath challenges to veterans and their families, thus making it the duty of the community and the government to address such issues. By the end of the year 2008, approximately 1.7 million Americans had played an essential role in Iraq and Afghanistan, thus suffering from various mental disorders (Spelman et al., 2012). The recovery process that was designed to help the veterans regain life in the city had many flaws and failed to meet the needs of the victims. The process ignored the problems that family members face as a result of the deployment of a family member, and they focused on helping the direct victim. As a result, the problems continued existing in society with such families failing to acquire basic needs and treatment in mental illness. Therefore, it is crucial that the recovery process to also be extended to the family members for the veterans.
There is a significant difference between what happens in the recovery process and what people perceive to be the reality. The recovery process focuses on addressing the problems that face the vets and ignores the challenges that face their close relations. For example, 80% of the veterans wanted family members especially children, parents, and spouses included in the recovery process because the effects of the war went beyond mental impacts (Sayers, 2011). Though the vets got direct involvement in the war, their family members played an essential role in ensuring that their family member remained unbeaten in the fields they operate. For example, during deployment, the veteran felt isolated and faced with high levels of stress. As a result, it became the responsibility of family members to apply all the strategies available to ensure that this feeling did not persist. After the veteran came home, family members had to help the individual in receiving and regaining the normal living circumstance. This information indicates that the recovery process undermined the post-traumatic stress disorder that faced family members by limiting the recovery process to the veterans.
Delegate your assignment to our experts and they will do the rest.
The veterans and their families also require the implementation of financial and economic support that would assist the vets in securing new jobs and working to acquire resources for supporting the family. The veterans engaged in the war with an objective for protecting the entire community in the United States. However, after the war, their families continued living in poverty because the recovery program failed to incorporate and implement strategies that could assist such families in securing training and jobs. As a result, most of the veterans and their families were submerged in poverty and issues of domestic violence. For example, marital problems, mood changes, and anger acting are recognized as some of the challenges that faced people in society. These problems made it difficult for family members to live in harmony (Sayers, 2011). The recovery process needed to consider the financial needs of the family and the individual, thus providing an opportunity for either family members or the vet to secure a well-paying job in the country.
There existed cultural differences in the training of people in the society because nursing processes administered in the treatment process failed to adopt strategies that recognized the cultural needs of the people. The American generation continues experiencing suffering in families that originated from people who were involved in the armies. These challenges were associated with cultural incompetence in the nursing and treatment process. Though the program put in place had to ensure that military and their families received adequate treatment, only 41% of the families experienced the benefits associated with the treatment process (Spelman et al., 2012). The inability of the intervention mechanisms to address the needs of the vets originated from the fact that policymakers failed to consider the cultural policies and military culture. Such strategies would be applicable in achieving the needs of the family. Healthcare treatment represented some of the intervention mechanisms that would accompany the compensation process that the government had put in place. However, the veteran recovery process in America had ignored the importance of analyzing the cultural backgrounds of people in the treatment process. As a result, the post-traumatic effects continued existing even among family members, making it difficult to regain a happy life and become incorporated in society activities. Stress and depression that faced a majority of victims of Veterans discouraged such people from playing an active role in community activities.
The ineffectiveness of the treatment approach occurred because the majority of the veterans did not have an opportunity for receiving the information needed in serving the interests of the victims and people in society. The mental health effects of engagement in the war resulted in the development of stress and diverted the resources of the family and the community to offering treatment and incorporating the interests of the victims in community activities. For example, many people had post-traumatic stress disorder that affected the functioning of the family. The veterans who experienced the treatment failed to offer services in the society because it became challenging to coordinate their actions. The problems extended to the family level because 48% of the families in America continued experiencing challenges and strains associated growth in society (Turner & Chessor, 2015). This information indicates that the recovery process required readjustment to analyze and examine the cultural origins of people in the community.
The effects of cultural differences in the treatment of soldiers are revealed through the ineffectiveness of addressing the challenges facing the families of the vets. The problems originated from the idea that family members took active roles in assisting the deployed family member. However, their efforts remained unrecognized at the government level. In situations where vets needed to undergo any treatment process, there should have been consideration of the cultural beliefs. These values would have significantly impacted the effectiveness of strategies administered in dealing with the challenges associated with handling post-traumatic stress disorder. The recovery process failed to interpret the symptoms of the behavior portrayed by the vets, and family members based on the beliefs of the community.
The failure for incorporating the cultural aspects in offering treatment to vets and family members increased the inability for achieving success in the intervention mechanism. In effect, the ineffective of the treatment approach revealed through the problems that spread to family and community level. Understanding this argument required the analysis of the concepts of the family institution and the structural functioning theory. Turner & Chessor, (2015) outlines that the vets in the United States consist of people from different ethnic groups, indicating that the effects spread to family members and later spread to the society. The veterans comprised 6.8% of the total population in the United States, thus making it possible for drawing members from different regions in the community. As a result, the effects that faced people in the United States had a more significant opportunity for spreading to the government institution and family members. In effect, the stress experienced by people in society needed to ensure that people received information related to the development of people in the community.
The implementation of the veteran service was ineffective in the United States. There were 22 million veterans in the country and approximately 725,000 active duties military (Purcell et al., 2016). The vets build their lives in the regions and communities where they lived and served. Despite the existence of a large number of people in need of the treatment in the city, the Department of Veterans Affairs only recorded the people who volunteered and had an active connection to the army. This strategy failed to be effective because only 27.5% of the veterans worldwide were able to use the mental healthcare approach (Purcell et al., 2016). The lack of visibility in the training process indicates that people needed to receive the information required in obtaining depression and stress in society.
The effects of the veteran war spread to society because people had little information about the impact of such activities in the community. As a result, 71% of the people in the organization agreed that people did not have information regarding the connection between the civilians and the veterans (MSN Ed, 2016). This population shows that the civilians had little to no understanding about the effectiveness of the recovery process despite the appreciation of the role the military played in the society. The connection between military personnel and people in the community continued to decline, making it difficult for people to achieve the desired results. Even people with direct relationships with the veteran did not have direct access to treatment process impact making it challenging to solve the problems experienced by the veterans. The treatment process needed to be accompanied by involvement of people in the society, thus making it easy to achieve the desired skills.
The treatment approach had been in a position to address the depression and stress disorders that faced veterans. This information indicates that people in the family and community level had indirect victims of the challenges experienced by the veterans. The family is an essential institution in society as it takes control of the socialization process. As a result, each member of the population had a role to play in promoting obedience in the United States. The effects of the vets indicated that there was a need for establishing a viable mechanism in dealing with the challenges facing the people (MSN Ed, 2016). The emotional and physical effects on military spread to the family level because the recovery process failed to be successful in incorporating the vet as a critical element of the institution. The anxiety associated with veteran mental health, and taking the duty for caring caused a significant impact on the family members. For example, one of the parents was deployed and another left to take the role of taking care of children, the later had duties for taking care of the home. Such tasks became challenging, thus increasing the level of stress among all the members of the family.
The effects experienced at the individual and family level passed to other generations in society. For instance, approximately 95,000 depended on the veterans, making it a necessity to include such people in the recovery process (Moriarty et al., 2016). Widowers and widows in the community suffered challenges originating from the impact of veteran war. The needs of children, widowers, and windows remain different depending on the circumstances of their loss. For example, in a situation where an individual died at a young age, people from the society and the community level experienced a sudden loss, and the effects existed to the nation, especially at the family level. The occurrence of this issue remains unplanned, thus causing problems such as financial challenges. Grief reactions always remained in existence even in situations where a family member died as a result of the war.
The problems experienced by the vets also spread to the community level. In circumstances where a family member became deployed and died while on duty, most of the families were used, making it challenging to survive in society. For instance, homelessness became a problem in the United States, and the situation worsened in areas where one of the family members died or experienced injuries in the war (Moriarty et al., 2016). In cases where the veteran died, the family experienced financial burdens depriving the opportunity for securing funds that could be applied in acquiring a home and creating access to education for kids. Addressing these challenges required the implementation of a strategy applicable to helping people achieving a home. The recovery process failed to include family members as well as considering the norms that would help to minimize the effects that deployment can cause to the community. Additionally, drug abuse is a social phenomenon that may worsen the situation where people received information related to the needs associated with the functioning of society.
In conclusion, the recovery process designed to help veterans in handling the challenges they faced should have been accompanied by considering the needs of other people in society. The recovery process should have included both direct and indirect victims of the veteran war. This strategy would involve the analysis of the cultural backgrounds of the individual and develop treatment and recovery mechanisms that addressed the needs of such people based on beliefs and norms. Family members could adequately support the gap between cultural expectations and standards, thus increasing the viability of the recovery process. Family members involved in the assessment process would be able to address the financial needs and mental impacts that could affect the wellbeing of the community. Community members can provide accuracy, hopeful message, and a treatment that could be incorporated in the treamen5 and recovery process of the vets and their families.
References
Moriarty, H., Winter, L., Robinson, K., Piersol, C. V., Vause-Earland, T., Iacovone, D. B., ..& Gitlin, L. N. (2016). A randomized controlled trial to evaluate the veterans' in-home program for military veterans with traumatic brain injury and their families: report on impact for family members. PM&R, 8(6), 495-509.
MSN Ed, R. N. (2016). Experiences of military spouses of veterans with combat-related posttraumatic stress disorder. Journal of Nursing Scholarship, 48(6), 543.
Purcell, N., Koenig, C. J., Bosch, J., & Maguen, S. (2016). Veterans’ perspectives on the psychosocial impact of killing in war. The Counseling Psychologist, 44(7), 1062-1099.
Sayers, S. L. (2011). Family reintegration difficulties and couples therapy for military veterans and their spouses. Cognitive and Behavioral Practice, 18(1), 108-119.
Spelman, J. F., Hunt, S. C., Seal, K. H., & Burgo-Black, A. L. (2012). Post deployment care for returning combat veterans . Journal of general internal medicine, 27(9), 1200-1209.
Turner, J., & Chessor, D. (2015). Relationship satisfaction, conflict and psychological distress: The impact of combat deployment to Afghanistan on the romantic partners of Australian Army personnel. Journal of Relationships Research, 6.
