The Bill of Rights are the first ten amendments to the U.S. Constitution. Considered the cornerstone of the basic American freedoms, the Bill of Rights specifies the fundamental rights and liberties of Americans. It became part of the U.S. Constitution on December 15, 1791 (Cogan, 2015). But the big question is: was the Bill of Rights a necessary addition to the Constitution? In my opinion, the Bill of Rights was a necessary addition to the Constitution to ensure ratification.
The failure to mention basic rights and liberties in the U.S. Constitution raised a number of issues that sparked raging debates over whether or not to ratify the Constitution. In particular, the U.S. Constitution did not protect the American people from the whims of the popular majority opinion and inconsistent and oppressive rule of government officials. In order to secure their fundamental rights and liberties, there was a need to introduce some amendments to the U.S. constitution (Baracskay, 2018). These included the free exercise of religion, freedom of speech, and protection against unreasonable searches and seizures (Baracskay, 2018). In this respect, the Bill of Rights was drafted and added to the U.S. Constitution. In this way, the Bill of Rights resolved one of the most glaring deficiencies of the U.S. constitution -preventing the abuse of individual fundamental rights and liberties. Without it, the entire Constitution would have crumbled. Thus, the Bill of Rights was a necessary addition to the U.S. Constitution.
Delegate your assignment to our experts and they will do the rest.
References
Baracskay, D. (2018). Bill of Rights. [Online]. Retrieved January 18, 2021, from Middle Tennessee State University https://mtsu.edu/first-amendment/article/1448/bill-of-rights
Cogan, N. H. (2015). The complete Bill of Rights: The drafts, debates, sources, and origins . Oxford University Press.
